最高の専用 CPU ホスティング (2026): 12 予約済みコアを含むプランの比較 - JA
DigitalOcean charges USD 42/month for two dedicated CPU cores. HostArmada hands you a reserved KVM core for USD 3.69. Both call it "専用CPU," and the 11x gap between them is the whole story of this category. Some hosts give you a full physical core that no other tenant can touch. Others reserve a thread. A few just slap "専用のリソース" on oversold shared hosting and hope you don't check.
簡単な回答: For the cheapest true reserved core, ホストアルマダキック starts at USD 3.69/mo if you can run your own Linux box. For managed dedicated vCPU without the sysadmin work, インモーション VPS 4 あなたに与えます 4 コアと 8 GB for USD 9.99/mo. For compute-heavy apps that pin the CPU for hours, DigitalOcean CPU-Optimized また Akamai Dedicated are the cleaner picks.
にジャンプ: HostArmada ・・ MochaHost ・・ Ultahost ・・ FastComet ・・ 動いている ・・ SiteGround ・・ Stablepoint ・・ DreamHost ・・ DigitalOcean ・・ Vultr ・・ アカマイ (Linode) ・・ カマテラ
最終レビュー済み: 六月 2026. 価格と機能を検証しました.
これらのプロバイダーの選択方法
A "専用CPU" plan only earns the label if the cores are reserved for you. That single rule did most of the filtering. We dropped any plan where the host oversells cores and lets neighbors borrow yours, the burstable-vCPU model behind most cheap shared hosting. 例外: a couple of providers here reserve resources through CloudLinux limits rather than true KVM cores, and we flag that openly in their sections so you can judge it yourself.
4つのことに重みを付けました, 順番に. 初め, core type: a full physical core (Kamatera Type D) ranks above a dedicated thread (Vultr, アカマイ), which ranks above a reserved vCPU share on a managed VPS. 2番, storage medium, because NVMe beats SATA SSD on the database-heavy workloads that push people toward dedicated cores in the first place. 三番, 更新対参入の比率, 米ドル以来 10 plan that renews at USD 25 is a USD 25 予定. 第4, the uptime SLA and whether the host promises no overselling.
Sources were official pricing and SLA pages checked in June 2026, cross-referenced against recent user-review aggregators and independent uptime monitors. 2 つの正直な制限: we did not run synthetic load tests, それで "ひたむきな" here means contractually reserved, not benchmarked under stress. And renewal pricing on Ultahost and MochaHost could not be fully confirmed on their live product pages, so we marked those figures as approximate rather than guess.
| ホスティングプロバイダー | レビュー | 総合評価 | の専用サーバー |
|---|---|---|---|
1  HostArmada
|
1.1k + |
|
$81.95 / mo. -85% 今 |
2  MochaHost
|
3.8k + |
|
$17.50 / mo. -50% 今 |
3  Ultahost
|
854 |
|
$74.80 / mo. フラッシュセール -40% |
4  FastComet
|
3.5k + |
|
$107.06 / mo. -80% オフ |
5  InMotionホスティング
|
2.8k + |
|
$35.00 / mo. -75% |
6  SiteGround
|
29.1k + |
|
データなし / mo. 今 -81% |
7  Stablepoint
|
915 |
|
$71.16 / mo. 1.99 英ポンド |
8  DreamHost
|
7.7k + |
|
$199.00 / mo. フラッシュセール |
9  デジタルオーシャン
|
1.9k + |
|
データなし / mo. |
10  Linode
|
242 |
|
$20.00 / mo. |
11  カマテラ
|
320 |
|
$19.00 / mo. 30 無料日数 |
1. HostArmada
1.1k +
4.9
ポジティブ
ポジティブ
| 保管所 | CPU | ラム | 価格 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 160 GB | 4 x 2.2GHz | 8 GB | $81.95 / mo. | プランを見る |
| 320 GB | 8 x 2.2GHz | 16 GB | $114.95 / mo. | プランを見る |
| 640 GB | 16 x 2.2GHz | 32 GB | $180.95 / mo. | プランを見る |
HostArmada – Best for the cheapest reserved core
エントリ: 3.69ドル/月 (スパーク, 自己管理) · Renewal: 8.20ドル/月 ・・ 1 KVM core / 1 GB RAM / 40 GB NVMe / 2 TB transfer · 7-day refund (VPS)
米ドル 3.69. That is the floor for a real reserved core in this guide, and it comes from HostArmada's self-managed Spark plan. You get one KVM core that nobody else can borrow, 40 GBのNVMe, およびフルルートアクセス. For a staging box, a small API, or a hobby project that needs steady CPU, nothing else here gets close on price.
One thing to clear up first, because HostArmada's own marketing muddies it. The company sells cheap "クラウドSSD" shared plans that advertise "dedicated resources." Those are not dedicated cores. The reserved-core product is the KVM VPS line (スパーク, フラックス, 融合, Ignition), and that distinction matters if you're buying for isolation rather than a marketing word. The Spark's USD 3.69 entry undercuts MochaHost's cheapest VPS, the Ristretto4 at USD 7.98/mo, に 54%, and it ships NVMe where MochaHost gives you plain SSD.
If you want the core managed, HostArmada's Web Shuttle starts at USD 29.95/mo and USD 59.90/月で更新, which is a steep jump for a single managed core. The self-managed line is the value play. Spark doubling to USD 8.20 on renewal is honest by the standards of this list, and HostArmada at least publishes the number instead of hiding it.
- Cheapest true reserved KVM core at 3.69ドル/月
- NVMe storage on every VPS tier, SATA SSDではありません
- Nine data centers across the US, ヨーロッパ, インド, シンガポール, シドニー
- Stated no-overselling policy on KVM cores
- ただ、 7-当日返金 VPS上で (共有取得 45)
- Managed Web Shuttle renewal nearly doubles to USD 59.90
- "クラウドSSD" shared naming misleads on what's actually dedicated
こんな方に最適: tinkerers who want a real reserved core for pocket change and can handle a terminal. 次の場合はスキップします: you need someone else to patch the server.
Choose HostArmada Spark if you want the lowest-cost reserved core and have root-access skills. If you want that same core managed, スキップしてください; InMotion の VPS 4 is USD 9.99/mo with cPanel and four cores. If flat renewal pricing is your priority, Vultr holds USD 28/mo for as long as you stay.
2. MochaHost
3.8k +
4.5
ポジティブ
ポジティブ
| 保管所 | CPU | ラム | 価格 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 80 GB | 2 コア | 4 GB | $17.50 / mo. | プランを見る |
| 80 GB | 2 コア | 4 GB | $22.50 / mo. | プランを見る |
| 160 GB | 4 コア | 8 GB | $32.50 / mo. | プランを見る |
MochaHost – Best for storage on a tight budget
エントリ: USD 9.98/mo (Perfetto1) · Renewal: claimed flat at USD 9.98 (disputed) ・・ 1 core @ 2.4 GHz / 3 GB RAM / 60 GB SSD · 30-day refund + 180-day risk-free
Start with what's missing: MochaHost still ships plain SATA SSD, NVMeではありません, and its cores run at a modest 2.4 GHz. For a database under load, that hardware shows its age. では、なぜそれを含めるのか? 保管所. MochaHost's VPS tiers run from 40 GB up to 200 GB, and the Dedicated Cloud line adds burstable RAM ranges most budget hosts won't touch.
The price comparison is unflattering, けれど. MochaHost's Perfetto1 costs USD 9.98/mo for one core, 3 GB, と 60 GB of SATA SSD. InMotion の VPS 4 costs USD 9.99/mo, one cent more, and gives you four dedicated vCPU, 8 GBのRAM, と 160 GBのNVMe. Same money, four times the cores and faster disk. MochaHost only wins here if you value raw storage capacity over compute and disk speed.
MochaHost advertises that prices "never increase" と一緒に 100% uptime SLA and a 180-day risk-free window. Treat the no-increase promise with care: the headline rates require a two-to-three-year prepay, and user reports describe renewal bills climbing despite the lifetime-discount language. The 30-日帰り guarantee is real and standard; the 180-day claim has conditions worth reading before you trust it.
- たっぷり収納: 40 GBから 200 GB across VPS tiers
- Dedicated Cloud line with flexible burstable RAM
- 100% uptime SLA advertised, plus 180-day risk-free claim
- SATA SSD, NVMeではありません, すべての層で
- Modest 2.4 GHz cores hurt database workloads
- ヘッドライン価格には 2-3 年前払い, と "増加なし" is disputed
こんな方に最適: buyers who want lots of cheap storage and will commit to a long term. 次の場合はスキップします: your workload is CPU- or disk-bound rather than storage-bound.
Pick MochaHost if storage capacity matters more than core speed and you're fine prepaying years up front. If you want faster disk at the same price, InMotion の VPS 4 wins on cores and NVMe. If you distrust the long prepay entirely, Vultr bills hourly with no contract at all.
3. Ultahost
854
4.6
ポジティブ
ポジティブ
| 保管所 | CPU | ラム | 価格 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 480 GB | 4 コア | 16 GB | $74.80 / mo. | プランを見る |
| 960 GB | 6 コア | 64 GB | $97.80 / mo. | プランを見る |
| 960 GB | 12 コア | 64 GB | $115.80 / mo. | プランを見る |
Ultahost – Best managed dedicated cores under USD 5
エントリ: USD 4.80/月 (基本, 2-年間プロモーション) · Regular: ~USD 7.99/mo ・・ 1 芯 / 1 GB DDR5 / 30 GB NVMe / AMD EPYC · 30-day refund
Where FastComet wants USD 46 for one managed core, Ultahost asks USD 4.80. That is the headline, and for a fully managed VPS on AMD EPYC silicon with DDR5 memory and NVMe storage, it is a real number. Ultahost markets this as cloud hosting; it is closer to a managed VPS with reserved cores, which for most buyers is the thing they actually wanted anyway.
The managed layer is what separates Ultahost from HostArmada's cheaper self-managed Spark. HostArmada's Spark is USD 3.69 but hands you root and walks away. Ultahost's Basic is USD 4.80, 約 30% もっと, and includes migration, セキュリティ強化, and DDoS protection handled for you. For someone who doesn't want to touch a terminal, それ 30% premium buys back a lot of weekend hours.
2 つの正直な注意事項. The base tier ships only 1 GBのRAM, which is thin for anything past a small site, so budget for the Business tier (2 GB) if you're running WordPress with plugins. And the renewal picture is murky: the promo holds USD 4.80 on a two-year term, but the regular list price is around USD 7.99/mo, and Ultahost doesn't publish a clean post-term figure. Assume it renews toward the regular rate, プロモーションではありません.
- Fully managed dedicated cores from USD 4.80/月
- AMD EPYC CPU, DDR5 RAM, NVMeストレージ
- 無料移行, SSL, DDoS 保護も含まれています
- 30-当日返金, double HostArmada's VPS window
- Base tier's 1 GB RAM is tight for real workloads
- Renewal pricing isn't transparent (regular ~USD 7.99)
- "クラウド" branding is really a managed VPS
こんな方に最適: people who want managed dedicated cores at a shared-hosting price. 次の場合はスキップします: you need published, predictable renewal numbers.
Buy Ultahost if you want hands-off management on real cores and can live with opaque renewals. If renewal transparency is non-negotiable, DreamHost publishes every number even though it lands higher. If you'd rather self-manage and save the premium, HostArmada Spark is USD 3.69.
4. FastComet
3.5k +
4.8
ポジティブ
ポジティブ
| 保管所 | CPU | ラム | 価格 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 80 GB | 2 コア | 4 GB | $107.06 / mo. | プランを見る |
| 160 GB | 4 コア | 8 GB | $130.16 / mo. | プランを見る |
| 320 GB | 8 コア | 16 GB | $176.36 / mo. | プランを見る |
FastComet – Best for hands-off managed cloud (with one caveat)
エントリ: 46.16ドル/月 (クラウド 1) · Renewal: 65.95ドル/月 ・・ 1 virtual core / 2 GB ECC RAM / 50 GB SSD / 2 TB・7日間返金 (VPS)
FastComet's cores aren't labeled "ひたむきな" anywhere on the current pricing page. They're called "virtual cores," and for an article about dedicated CPU, that wording deserves a flag. The resources are reserved per plan, and FastComet pairs them with ECC RAM and a fully managed cPanel/WHM layer, but if your reason for buying is a contractual dedicated-core guarantee in writing, read the fine print before you commit.
What you're really paying for is the managed experience. cPanel and WHM come included, plus free migration, a Cloudflare CDN, と 24/7 サポート. それがピッチです. The problem is the math against unmanaged cloud. ファストコメットのクラウド 1 is USD 46.16/mo for one virtual core and 2 GB. DigitalOcean's CPU-Optimized droplet is USD 42/mo for two dedicated vCPU and 4 GB. DigitalOcean gives you double the cores and double the RAM for less money; FastComet's premium buys the management and the control panel, 他には何もない.
Since the WebPros acquisition, FastComet's old "flat pricing forever" promise is gone. The Cloud VPS line now renews around 1.4x the promo (クラウド 1 USDからになります 46.16 米ドルへ 65.95), which is mild next to the roughly 5x jumps now hitting its shared plans. The VPS refund window is also short at 7 日々, so test fast.
- cPanel/WHM を含むフルマネージド
- ECC RAM and free Cloudflare CDN on every tier
- その周り 11 データセンター, customer-selectable
- Cores labeled "バーチャル," いいえ "ひたむきな"
- ただ、 7-当日の VPS 返金
- 米ドル 46+ entry for one core is steep next to unmanaged cloud
こんな方に最適: buyers who want a managed control panel and won't touch the server. 次の場合はスキップします: you want a written dedicated-core guarantee or better price-per-core.
Choose FastComet if cPanel and hands-off management justify the premium for you. If you want twice the cores for less and can self-manage, DigitalOcean CPU-Optimized is USD 42. If you want managed cores far cheaper, Ultahost starts at USD 4.80.
5. InMotion Hosting
2.8k +
4.0
ポジティブ
中性
| 保管所 | CPU | ラム | 価格 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 TB | 4 x 3GHz | 16 GB | $35.00 / mo. | プランを見る |
| 2 TB | 4 x 3.5GHz | 32 GB | $89.99 / mo. | プランを見る |
| 1 TB | 6 x 3.5GHz | 64 GB | $149.99 / mo. | プランを見る |
InMotion Hosting – Best dedicated vCPU value
エントリ: 9.99ドル/月 (VPS 4, 24-mo) · Renewal: 16.99ドル/月 ・・ 4 専用vCPU / 8 GB RAM / 160 GB NVMe / 5 TB · 90-day refund
Picture a 15,000-visitor WordPress site with a busy comments section and a couple of plugins that hit the database hard. You want dedicated cores, you don't want to learn server administration, and you want a refund window long enough to actually test under real traffic. That profile is exactly where InMotion's VPS 4 lands.
The page states it plainly: dedicated vCPU and dedicated RAM, NVMeストレージ, full root if you want it. 4つのコア, 8 GB, と 160 GB of NVMe for USD 9.99/mo is the strongest price-to-spec on this list. Hold it against DreamHost's Business plan, which is USD 10/mo for two cores, 2 GB, と 60 GB. Same money, and InMotion doubles the cores, quadruples the RAM, and nearly triples the storage. There isn't a closer call to make.
The 90-day money-back window is the other standout, longer than any cloud provider here and far past FastComet's 7 日々. Two cautions, けれど. 米ドル 9.99 rate needs a 24-月単位のコミットメント, and renewals climb hard on the bigger tiers: VPS 8 jumps to USD 46.99/mo and VPS 16 to USD 111.99/mo. Entry-tier renewal at USD 16.99 stays reasonable. InMotion also runs only three regions (two US, one Amsterdam), so latency outside North America and Western Europe suffers.
- Best spec-per-dollar: 4 vCPU + 8 GB, 160 GB NVMe, 米ドル 9.99
- Industry-long 90-当日返金 ウィンドウ
- Dedicated vCPU and RAM stated explicitly, NVMe搭載
- Free managed onboarding via Launch Assist
- Lowest rate locked behind a 24-月 期間
- Higher tiers renew steeply (VPS 8 hits USD 46.99)
- Only three data center regions
こんな方に最適: WordPress and WooCommerce sites that want managed dedicated cores cheap. 次の場合はスキップします: your audience sits in Asia, アフリカ, または南アメリカ.
Buy InMotion VPS 4 if you want the most dedicated cores per dollar with a long safety net to test. If your visitors are far from the US or Amsterdam, 鎌寺の 24 regions or Vultr's 33 serve them better. If you refuse a two-year term, SiteGround Cloud bills flat monthly with no lock-in.
6. SiteGround
29.1k +
4.8
ポジティブ
ポジティブ
SiteGround – Best fully-managed dedicated cloud
エントリ: 100ドル/月 (ジャンプスタート) · Renewal: ハイキングはありません, フラット米ドル 100 ・・ 4 専用コア / 8 GB RAM / 40 GB SSD / 5 TB · 14-day refund · Google Cloud
米ドル 100 a month to start. No intro discount, no promo rate that doubles later, just USD 100 from day one. That price tag will scare off anyone shopping on entry cost, そしてそれはそうすべきです, because SiteGround Cloud is not competing on price. It's competing on being the managed dedicated-cloud option you never have to think about.
The plan runs on Google Cloud with dedicated, isolated CPU and RAM and smart autoscaling that absorbs traffic spikes without a manual resize. Jump Start gives you four dedicated cores and 8 GB. Compare that to DigitalOcean's General Purpose droplet at USD 63/mo for two dedicated vCPU and 8 GB: SiteGround costs 59% もっと, but doubles the cores and hands you a fully managed stack with staging, 毎日のバックアップ, と 24/7 優先サポート. DigitalOcean leaves all of that to you.
One clarification that trips people up: SiteGround's regular shared plans (起動, GrowBig, GoGeek) do not give you dedicated CPU. Only the Cloud line does. The flat pricing is the real draw here, no renewal trap exists, which across this list is rare. The weak spots are a short 14-当日返金 and a modest 40 GB of storage for the money.
- True flat pricing, 更新増加なし
- Managed Google Cloud with dedicated CPU and RAM
- 自動スケーリング, 演出, 毎日の地理分散バックアップ
- 99.99% 稼働時間SLA
- 急な 100ドル/月 エントリ, no cheaper on-ramp
- Short 14-day refund
- それだけ 40 GB storage on the entry tier
こんな方に最適: businesses that want managed dedicated cloud and will pay to never touch a server. 次の場合はスキップします: USD 100/mo is out of reach or you're happy self-managing.
Choose SiteGround Cloud if predictable flat pricing and full management justify the premium. If USD 100 is too steep and you can self-manage, Akamai 専用 8 GB gives similar hardware unmanaged for far less. If you want managed but cheaper, InMotion's VPS line starts at USD 9.99.
7. Stablepoint
915
4.7
ポジティブ
ポジティブ
| 保管所 | CPU | ラム | 価格 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50 GB | 2 コア | 2 GB | $71.16 / mo. | プランを見る |
| 70 GB | 2 コア | 4 GB | $77.63 / mo. | プランを見る |
| 150 GB | 4 コア | 8 GB | $116.45 / mo. | プランを見る |
Stablepoint – Best isolated containers across 80+ 地域
エントリ: ~USD 1.99/mo · Renewal: roughly doubles · CloudLinux isolation (not reserved cores) / まで 4 GB per account / NVMe · 30-day refund
Stablepoint doesn't sell dedicated cores, and pretending otherwise would fail this article's own rule. Each cPanel account runs in an isolated cloud container with CloudLinux LVE limits capping CPU and RAM per site (まで 4 GB per account). That's resource isolation, not a reserved physical core nobody else can borrow. If your definition of "専用CPU" is strict, Stablepoint isn't it.
それで、なぜここにあるのですか? Because for the buyer who actually wants guaranteed, predictable resources without the cost or admin of a real VPS, the container model can do the job. And Stablepoint's reach is hard to match: より多い 80 global locations built on Google Cloud, AWS, Azure, とデジタルオーシャン, with a single site placed close to its audience. Support is all engineers, with a dedicated Slack channel rather than tiered ticket queues.
The price math against a real core is the honest tell. Stablepoint's entry runs about USD 1.99/mo for a CloudLinux-limited slice. For USD 3.69, 86% もっと, HostArmada's Spark gives you an actual reserved KVM core with root access. You're trading the container's geographic spread and managed convenience for the lack of a true dedicated core. Renewals also roughly double, and the exact figures vary between sources, so confirm your tier's renewal before buying.
- 80+ グローバルリージョン, site placed near its audience
- All-engineer support with a dedicated Slack channel
- NVMeストレージ, LiteSpeed, 1 日 2 回のバックアップ
- 30-当日返金
- Not true dedicated cores (CloudLinux の分離)
- Renewals roughly double, figures inconsistent across sources
- 4 GB per-account RAM cap limits heavy workloads
こんな方に最適: multi-region sites that want isolated, predictable resources without VPS admin. 次の場合はスキップします: you need a contractually reserved physical or KVM core.
Pick Stablepoint if geographic reach and managed isolation matter more than owning a literal core. If you need a true reserved core cheap, HostArmada Spark is USD 3.69. If you want a real physical core, Kamatera Type D is USD 19.
8. DreamHost
7.7k +
4.6
ポジティブ
ポジティブ
| 保管所 | CPU | ラム | 価格 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 480 GB | 6 コア | 16 GB | $199.00 / mo. | プランを見る |
| 480 GB | 12 コア | 32 GB | $299.00 / mo. | プランを見る |
DreamHost – Best for unlimited sites on dedicated cores
エントリ: 10ドル/月 (仕事, 3-年) · Renewal: 24.99ドル/月 ・・ 2 コア / 2 GB RAM / 60 GB NVMe / 無制限の帯域幅 + sites · 30-day refund
DreamHost finally fixed the thing that used to keep it off dedicated-CPU lists. Its Managed VPS page now states that RAM, CPU, and storage are 100% dedicated to your VPS across every tier, correcting the old model where lower tiers shared CPU. So the Business plan at USD 10/mo really does give you two reserved cores, プラス 60 GB of NVMe and, 珍しく, unlimited bandwidth and unlimited websites.
それか "無制限のサイト" piece is the angle. If you're an agency or freelancer parking a dozen small client sites on one box, DreamHost lets you do it without per-site limits. Where it loses is raw spec value. Business is USD 10/mo for two cores and 2 GB; InMotion の VPS 4 is USD 9.99/mo for four cores and 8 GB. InMotion is a penny cheaper with double the cores and quadruple the RAM, and it stays cheaper at renewal too (米ドル 16.99 against DreamHost's USD 24.99).
Two things to weigh. DreamHost backs every plan with a 100% 稼働時間保証, which is stronger on paper than the 99.99% most rivals quote. But the USD 10 rate needs a three-year commitment, データセンターは米国のみです (no EU or Asia option for VPS), and the refund window was cut from 97 までの日数 30 日々 7月に 2025. The old marathon refund is gone.
- 100% 専用CPU, 羊, and storage on every tier
- Unlimited bandwidth and unlimited sites
- 100% 稼働時間保証, NVMeストレージ
- Every price published, no opaque renewals
- Lowest rate needs a 3-年期
- 更新は米ドルにジャンプします 24.99 (InMotion stays cheaper)
- 米国専用のデータセンター; refund cut to 30 days in 2025
こんな方に最適: agencies hosting many small sites on one dedicated-core box. 次の場合はスキップします: you want maximum cores per dollar or a non-US data center.
Choose DreamHost if unlimited sites and a 100% uptime guarantee outweigh raw specs. If you want more cores for the same money, インモーション VPS 4 完全に勝ちます. If you need a European or Asian region, Kamatera and Vultr both deliver where DreamHost can't.
9. Digital Ocean
1.9k +
3.7
中性
中性
DigitalOcean – Best CPU-Optimized droplets for compute-heavy apps
エントリ: 42ドル/月 (CPU最適化) · Pricing: flat hourly, no renewal ・・ 2 専用vCPU / 4 GB / 25 GB SSD / 4 TB · USD 200 クレジット, 60 days · 99.99% SLA
If your app pins the CPU at or near 100% for hours, ビデオエンコーディング, CI pipelines, バッチ処理, simulation, this is the category you actually need, and DigitalOcean's CPU-Optimized droplets are built for it. The cores are fully dedicated, the performance is consistent under sustained load, and the billing is honest cloud pricing: USD 42/mo or roughly USD 0.0625/hour, the same rate forever, no promo-to-renewal trap anywhere.
The trade-off is management. There's no cPanel and no hand-holding; you get a clean control panel, excellent docs, and a developer experience that's deservedly well-regarded, but you run the server. Storage is the second limit. CPU-Optimized entry ships only 25 SSDのGB. Set it against Akamai's Dedicated 4 GB plan at USD 36/mo, which gives the same 2 vCPU と 4 GB but 80 GBのNVMe. Akamai is 14% cheaper with 3.2x the storage, which makes it the better buy unless you specifically want DigitalOcean's managed databases, クベネフィット, or App Platform around the droplet.
米ドル 200 無料クレジットが終了しました 60 days is generous enough to prototype a real workload before committing a cent. For a dedicated cloud host aimed at cloud-native developers, that's the right way to earn trust.
- Truly dedicated cores tuned for sustained 100% CPU
- Flat hourly pricing, 更新マークアップなし
- Best-in-class docs and managed add-ons (DBs, クベネフィット)
- 米ドル 200 クレジット 以上 60 テストまでの日数
- 管理されていない, cパネルなし
- それだけ 25 GB SSD on the CPU-Optimized entry
- Costs more per GB of storage than Akamai
こんな方に最適: developers running compute-bound jobs who want clean, flat-priced dedicated cores. 次の場合はスキップします: you want a control panel or lots of cheap storage.
Choose DigitalOcean CPU-Optimized if sustained compute and developer tooling are the point. If you want the same cores with far more storage for less, Akamai 専用 4 GB is USD 36. If you need it managed with cPanel, FastComet handles that at a price premium.
Vultr – Best for global dedicated vCPU reach
エントリ: 28ドル/月 (最適化されたクラウド コンピューティング) · Pricing: flat hourly, no renewal ・・ 1 専用vCPU / 2 GB / 25 GB NVMe / 4 TB · up to USD 300 クレジット / 30 days · 100% 稼働時間SLA
USD 28/mo and 33 データセンター地域. That combination is Vultr's pitch in one line. If your users are scattered across continents and you want a dedicated vCPU close to each cluster of them, no one here matches Vultr's geographic spread. The Optimized Cloud Compute line runs fully dedicated AMD EPYC vCPU on all-NVMe storage, billed hourly at a flat rate that never jumps.
The entry tier is thin, けれど: one dedicated vCPU and 2 GB is fine for a small production service but not for anything memory-hungry, so plan to size up. On price-per-core against a true physical core, Vultr sits in an interesting spot. Its USD 28/mo buys one dedicated vCPU thread; Kamatera's Type D at USD 19/mo buys a full physical core (two threads) 為に 32% 少ない. Vultr counters with NVMe storage included, double the RAM, and that 33-region map Kamatera's 24 can't quite match.
ヴァルターの 100% host and network uptime SLA is credit-backed, and the new-account credit runs up to USD 300 以上 30 日々, the largest trial allowance in this group. Like DigitalOcean and Akamai, it's unmanaged, so factor in your own time as part of the real cost.
- 33 データセンター地域, the widest reach here
- Dedicated AMD EPYC vCPU on all-NVMe storage
- Flat hourly pricing, 100% 稼働時間SLA
- まで 米ドル 300 トライアルクレジット
- エントリー層はちょうど 1 vCPU / 2 GB
- 管理されていない, no native cPanel
- Costs more than Kamatera for fewer threads
こんな方に最適: globally distributed apps that need a dedicated vCPU near every audience. 次の場合はスキップします: you want a full physical core or a managed panel.
Pick Vultr if reach and flat pricing across 33 regions are what you're buying. If you want a full physical core for less, Kamatera Type D is USD 19. If you need more storage on the same dedicated thread, Akamai gives 80 GB NVMe (USD) 36.
10. Linode
242
3.0
中性
中性
| 保管所 | CPU | ラム | 価格 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 80 GB | 2 コア | 4 GB | $20.00 / mo. | プランを見る |
| 160 GB | 4 コア | 8 GB | $60.00 / mo. | プランを見る |
| 320 GB | 8 コア | 16 GB | $120.00 / mo. | プランを見る |
アカマイ (Linode) – Best storage and network on a dedicated core
エントリ: 36ドル/月 (ひたむきな 4 GB) · Pricing: flat hourly, no renewal ・・ 2 専用vCPU / 4 GB / 80 GB NVMe / 4 TB · USD 100 credit · 99.99% SLA・ 41 地域
Akamai gives you the most storage per dollar of any dedicated-core option here, and it routes your traffic over one of the largest edge networks on the internet. The old Linode Dedicated CPU line now lives inside Akamai Connected Cloud, and the entry Dedicated 4 GB plan packs two dedicated vCPU, 4 GB, and a full 80 GB of NVMe for USD 36/mo.
That storage figure is the headline. Held against DigitalOcean's CPU-Optimized droplet at USD 42/mo (同じ 2 vCPU と 4 GB, しかし、ただ 25 GB SSD), Akamai is 14% cheaper and ships 3.2x the disk. For a database or a content-heavy app where storage fills up fast, that gap decides the purchase. Akamai's post-acquisition footprint also expanded hard, 今 41 compute regions across 36 都市, second only to Vultr on this list.
2 つの正直なメモ. It's unmanaged by default, with managed support as a paid add-on, so it suits people comfortable on a Linux box. And Akamai bills reserved resources even when a VM is powered off, so a stopped instance still costs you; shut it down in the panel only if you also resize or delete. 米ドル 100 new-account credit and credit-backed 99.99% SLA round out a strong, no-nonsense package.
- Most storage per dollar: 80 GB NVMe 米ドルで 36
- 41 regions on Akamai's global edge network
- Flat hourly pricing, credit-backed 99.99% SLA
- 米ドル 100 新規アカウントクレジット
- デフォルトでは管理対象外 (managed costs extra)
- Powered-off VMs still billed for reserved resources
- Entry tier RAM (4 GB) modest for heavy databases
こんな方に最適: storage-heavy apps that want dedicated cores on a fast global network. 次の場合はスキップします: you need a managed panel out of the box.
Choose Akamai Dedicated 4 GB if storage and network reach drive your decision. If you want DigitalOcean's managed-add-on ecosystem and don't mind less disk, its CPU-Optimized droplet is USD 42. If you'd rather have a full physical core, Kamatera Type D undercuts it at USD 19.
11. Kamatera
320
4.2
ポジティブ
ポジティブ
| 保管所 | CPU | ラム | 価格 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 40 GB | 2 ×5.33GHz | 4 GB | $19.00 / mo. | プランを見る |
| 50 GB | 2 ×5.33GHz | 8 GB | $32.00 / mo. | プランを見る |
Kamatera – Best for a true dedicated physical core
エントリ: 19ドル/月 (Type D dedicated core) · Pricing: 平らな, config-based ・・ 1 physical core (2 スレッド) / から 1 GB / SSD custom / custom transfer · 30-day trial + 米ドル 100 ・・ 99.95% SLA · optional managed
Kamatera is the only host here that sells you a literal physical core. Its Type D "ひたむきな" CPU is a full physical core, two threads, reserved entirely for you, where most rivals' "専用vCPU" is actually a single dedicated thread. For licensing tied to physical cores, or latency-sensitive workloads like trading where thread contention matters, that distinction is the whole reason to buy.
At USD 19/mo, that full core undercuts the dedicated-thread competition handily. Akamai 専用 4 GB is USD 36 for two vCPU threads; Vultr is USD 28 一つのために. Kamatera's Type D gives you a complete physical core (two threads) 為に 47% less than Akamai's plan. The pricing is calculator-based rather than fixed tiers, so you build the exact CPU, 羊, 保管所, and bandwidth you want, and a cheaper Type B "dedicated thread" option starts at USD 9/mo if a full core is overkill.
The other rarity here is the optional fully managed service, something none of the other unmanaged cloud players (DigitalOcean, Vultr, アカマイ) offer in-house. You can buy a dedicated physical core and have Kamatera run it for you. The trade is that the calculator pricing has no clean published tiers to comparison-shop at a glance, and the entry config's 1 GB RAM needs sizing up for most real work. The 30-日無料トライアル 米ドルで 100 credit is the longest here.
- A true full physical core (2 スレッド), not a single thread
- Optional fully managed service, rare among cloud IaaS
- Fully custom CPU/RAM/storage configuration
- 24 regions and the longest 30-一日トライアル
- Calculator pricing, no clean fixed tiers
- Entry config's 1 GB RAM needs sizing up
- Type D core costs more than a single dedicated thread elsewhere
こんな方に最適: licensing or latency-sensitive workloads that need a whole physical core. 次の場合はスキップします: a single dedicated thread is plenty and you want fixed-tier pricing.
Buy Kamatera Type D if you genuinely need a full physical core or want the option to have it managed. If a dedicated thread is enough and you want fixed pricing, Vultr is USD 28 NVMe搭載. If storage matters most, アカマイの 80 GB（USD） 36 beats it on disk.
1 ウクライナで最もレビューされている専用 CPU ホスティング プロバイダー (6月 2026)
| ホスティング名 | ユーザー満足度 % | レビュー数 | プロモーション |
|---|---|---|---|
 Linode |
60% | 344 | サイトに訪れる |
How to Choose a Dedicated CPU Plan
"専用CPU" covers everything from a USD 3.69 reserved KVM core to a USD 100 managed Google Cloud plan. The right pick depends on three things: whether you'll manage the server yourself, how compute-hungry your workload really is, ユーザーが座る場所. 実際のしきい値を使用した具体的なシナリオを次に示します。.
予算は月 5 ドル未満, comfortable with root access: ホストアルマダキック (米ドル 3.69, one KVM core, 40 GB NVMe). Skip DigitalOcean's USD 42 CPU-Optimized droplet at this scale; you'd pay 11x for isolation guarantees a small site will never notice.
Managed cores under USD 10/mo, no sysadmin work: インモーション VPS 4 (米ドル 9.99, four dedicated vCPU, 8 GB, cPanel). ここでFastCometをスキップしてください; 米ドル 46 for one virtual core is 4.6x the price for a quarter of the cores. This is also the sweet spot for a busy WooCommerce ストア that outgrew shared hosting.
Compute-bound, CPU pinned for hours (エンコーディング, CI, simulation): DigitalOcean CPU-Optimized (米ドル 42, two dedicated vCPU) or Akamai Dedicated (米ドル 36, より多くのストレージ). Skip burstable shared plans entirely; CPU steal will throttle you the moment a neighbor spikes. Game servers land here too, where tick-rate and latency punish any shared-core contention.
Set-and-forget managed, budget no object: SiteGround クラウド ジャンプ スタート (米ドル 100 平らな, four dedicated cores on Google Cloud). Skip it if USD 100 stings and you can self-manage; Akamai 専用 8 GB does similar hardware unmanaged for far less.
Need a full physical core for licensing or trading latency: Kamatera Type D (米ドル 19). Skip the Vultr and DigitalOcean entry tiers; those reserve a single thread, not a whole core, and the difference is real for thread-sensitive software. When even a dedicated core isn't enough, step up to a full 専用サーバー 代わりは.
よくある質問
Is a dedicated vCPU actually faster than a shared vCPU?
Not faster at peak, but far more consistent. A shared (破裂しやすい) vCPU can hit the same clock speed, but the host oversells the physical core, so when a neighbor spikes you suffer "CPUスティール" and your performance drops. A dedicated vCPU reserves that compute for you, so it holds steady under sustained load. For bursty, low-traffic sites the difference is small. データベース用, エンコーディング, or anything that runs the CPU hard for minutes at a time, dedicated wins clearly.
How much more does dedicated CPU hosting cost than shared?
いつもの 30% に 50% more for managed VPS plans, and several times more for branded cloud instances. HostArmada's reserved Spark core is USD 3.69/mo against roughly USD 2 に 3 for its shared plans. On the cloud side, DigitalOcean's shared droplets start near USD 4/mo while its dedicated CPU-Optimized line starts at USD 42. You're paying for isolation and predictable performance, 生の速度ではない, so only buy it if your workload actually needs steady CPU.
Is DigitalOcean or Vultr cheaper for a dedicated CPU instance?
Vultr is cheaper at entry. Its Optimized Cloud Compute starts at USD 28/mo for one dedicated vCPU, 2 GB, と 25 GB NVMe. DigitalOcean's CPU-Optimized droplet is USD 42/mo but gives you two dedicated vCPU and 4 GB, so on a per-core basis DigitalOcean is competitive. For the absolute lowest dedicated entry, Kamatera's Type D full physical core at USD 19/mo undercuts both. All three use flat pricing with no renewal jump.
Do I need dedicated CPU hosting, or is shared enough?
If your site runs under a few thousand daily visitors with normal traffic, shared or burstable hosting is fine and dedicated is wasted money. Move to dedicated cores when you see CPU-related slowdowns at peak, run a busy store or forum, or operate compute-heavy software (データベース, エンコーディング, trading bots) where a throttle costs you. 簡単なテスト: if your current host's CPU usage graph regularly hits its ceiling, 時間です. If it rarely does, stay put and save the cash.
最終評決
For the cheapest real reserved core, HostArmada Spark at USD 3.69/mo is unbeatable if you can manage your own box. For managed dedicated vCPU, 動いている VPS 4 is the value champion: four cores, 8 GB, と 160 GB NVMe for USD 9.99/mo with a 90-day refund nothing else here matches. Ultahost wins the cheap-managed niche at USD 4.80/mo if you accept opaque renewals.
For compute-bound work, DigitalOcean と アカマイ are the clean cloud picks, with Akamai's 80 GB NVMe edging it on storage value. Vultr takes global reach across 33 地域, と カマテラ is the only host selling a true full physical core, from USD 19/mo. Pay up for SiteGround Cloud only if flat-priced, fully managed Google Cloud is worth USD 100/mo to you. MochaHost, DreamHost, と Stablepoint serve narrower cases: cheap storage, 無制限のサイト, and multi-region isolation respectively.
Still weighing the category itself? If you're torn between a reserved core and a whole machine, 私たちのガイド VPS vs dedicated hosting breaks down the cost crossover. For budget-managed options beyond this list, を参照してください cheapest managed VPS plans, or start with our broader VPSホスティングの比較 to shop by raw value first.