多くの "best colocation" lists pad their rankings with companies that quit selling colocation years ago. Liquid Web shut its colocation product in 2021. DreamHost rents racks for its own gear, it does not lease them to you. IONOS and GreenGeeks never sold rack space at all. Strip out the names that no longer apply and the real global market narrows fast. What remains is eight providers that will actually rent you space for hardware you own in 2026. They run from a USD 49 single slot to a quote-only cabinet inside Equinix's 260-facility network.
簡単な回答: For the cheapest published single-server colocation, Hivelocity (米ドル 49 for a 1U) and ColoCrossing (米ドル 55) 鉛. For owned-facility compliance with pricing you can read before you call, HostDime publishes a flat per-U ladder with SOC 2 Type II and HIPAA. For global multi-region reach, ラックスペース (その周り 40 データセンター) and Equinix (260-プラス) are the enterprise picks. For EU data residency, Netcup's Nuremberg site carries ISO 27001 and GDPR alignment.
にジャンプ: InterServer, ラックスペース, フェニックスNAP, HostDime, ネットカップ, Hivelocity, ColoCrossing, エクイニクス
最終レビュー済み: 六月 2026. 価格設定, footprints, and compliance claims verified against provider websites and acquisition filings during research.
これらのプロバイダーの選択方法
One rule did the heavy lifting: a provider had to actively sell colocation as a buyable product on its own website in 2026. That single test removed five names other guides still recycle. IONOS, DreamHost, and GreenGeeks run their own hardware and sell no rack space. Liquid Web discontinued colocation in 2021, and Nexcess (now part of the same group) markets managed ecommerce, not cabinets. Listing any of them would have meant inventing pricing, which fails the honesty bar before it starts.
そこから, scoring weighted four things. Pricing transparency came first, because a published 1U rate beats a quote form for most buyers reading a comparison. Footprint and geographic reach came second, 以来 "グローバル" colocation only means something if a provider can put hardware in more than one region. Compliance depth ranked third: SOC 2 タイプⅡ, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, and HIPAA matter for regulated tenants, and we marked down providers that say "準拠した" without naming an attestation. Power density and connectivity rounded it out for AI-era and peering-heavy workloads.
正直な限界: we ran no synthetic load or power-draw tests. Netcup's colocation page geo-blocks non-EU traffic, so its rack pricing stayed unverified and we quote only its published configuration. Equinix never posts rack rates, so any cabinet figure here is an industry estimate, flagged as such. Where a number could not be confirmed on a live page, it is not in this article. For the line between renting space and renting managed servers, 私たちの colocation versus managed hosting guide covers the trade-off in depth.
InterServer – Best for Flat-Rate Single-Server Colocation
米ドル 100 月, and the invoice never moves. InterServer runs its colocation out of a single owned campus in Secaucus, ニュージャージー. The appeal is the pricing posture: 月ごと, セットアップ料金なし, and a price lock that keeps the rate flat for the life of the plan. A 1U ships with a 1 Gbps unmetered port and one IPv4 address. Scale up and the ladder stays published: a quarter rack (10U) runs USD 705/month, and a full 48U cabinet with a 20A/208V circuit lands at USD 1,200/month.
That last figure is the one worth sitting with. 米ドルで 1,200 for a 48U cabinet, InterServer charges roughly USD 25 per U at the top of its ladder, 対米ドル 100 for a lone 1U. The bundled 1 Gbps unmetered port is the real differentiator at the small end. 米ドルで 100 for a single server, InterServer matches HostDime's USD 100 Orlando 1U to the dollar. The split is bandwidth: HostDime caps a single box at 75 Mbps, while InterServer hands you a gigabit pipe with no transfer meter running.
The honest gap is paperwork and geography. InterServer has not published SOC 2, ヒパア, or PCI attestations for Secaucus, so regulated buyers should request documentation before signing. And it is one site, one metro. There is no second region to fail over to, which is fine for a single-server tenant and a dealbreaker for anyone who needs redundancy across cities.
長所:
- 発行済み USD 100/month 1U 価格ロック付き
- 1 Gbps unmetered port and 1 IPv4 included
- 月ごと, セットアップ料金なし, free remote hands
- Full ladder published up to a 48U cabinet
短所:
- One owned facility (セコーカス, NJ) それだけ
- 公開された SOC はありません 2 / ヒパア / PCI 認証
- Entry power is modest for dual-CPU boxes
価格設定: 1U from USD 100/month, quarter rack USD 705, full cabinet USD 1,200. 価格が固定されている, so the renewal rate equals the entry rate. No contract required.
こんな方に最適: Single-server to half-cabinet deployments in the NYC metro that want a flat, no-surprises bill.
次の場合はスキップします: You need multi-region redundancy or formal compliance attestations on file.
評決: 選ぶ InterServer when a flat month-to-month rate and a bundled gigabit port matter more than a compliance binder. If you need SOC 2 Type II and HIPAA at the same USD 100, go to HostDime instead. If you want the rack USD 50 cheaper and can bill bandwidth separately, Hivelocity's USD 49 1U undercuts it.
Rackspace – Best for Colocation Plus Managed Multicloud
Picture a team that owns its servers but has no interest in babysitting a multicloud network on top of them. That is the buyer Rackspace built its colocation product for. Rather than selling bare rack space, Rackspace wraps colocation around RackConnect Global, a fabric that stitches private links to AWS, Azure, 檻の中から Google Cloud を操作. You are renting space plus a managed-services bench, not just power and a cross-connect (the cable that links your servers to another network inside the building).
Footprint is the global selling point. Rackspace operates colocation across roughly 40 4大陸にまたがるデータセンター, extended further through partnerships with the likes of Digital Realty and Iron Mountain. Equinix runs 260-plus facilities, so Rackspace is not the reach leader. For a buyer who needs five metros under one contract and one support desk, けれど, that gap rarely bites, and Rackspace adds managed layers Equinix leaves entirely to you. Smart Hands commits to a one-hour response and 24-hour execution at select sites, and the company has run data centers since 1999.
Two cautions. Rackspace publishes no colocation pricing at any tier, so every deployment runs through a sales cycle and an enterprise contract. And its 2026 email-hosting price increase, which jumped per-mailbox rates sharply on short notice, rattled trust across the customer base. Colocation contracts are not email, but the lesson is to read repricing and notice clauses carefully before you sign a multi-year term.
長所:
- ラックコネクトグローバル マルチクラウドファブリック (AWS/Azure/GCP)
- その周り 40 4大陸にわたるデータセンター
- Smart Hands with a 1-hour response SLA at select sites
- 25-plus years operating data centers
短所:
- Quote-only; no published rack pricing
- エンタープライズ販売サイクル, not built for single servers
- 2026 email repricing dented pricing-stability trust
価格設定: Custom quote across all tiers; expect multi-year enterprise contracts. No published entry or renewal rate.
こんな方に最適: Enterprises that want colocation tied to managed multicloud connectivity under one vendor.
次の場合はスキップします: You only need rack space and a cross-connect, or you need to price a deployment without a sales call.
評決: 選ぶ ラックスペース when managed multicloud across continents is the actual requirement and you have an enterprise budget. If you only need a rack and an internet pipe, Equinix or any budget host here turns it up cheaper. If transparent pricing is non-negotiable, skip Rackspace outright; the quote wall is the product.
PhoenixNAP – Best for High-Density and Compliance-Heavy Workloads
The compliance stack is the reason regulated tenants shortlist PhoenixNAP: SOC 1, SOC 2 タイプⅡ, PCI DSS validated, ISO 27001, and HIPAA-ready. All of it is anchored at a Tier 3 Phoenix campus with 2N power redundancy. The flagship site spans roughly 530,000 平方フィート, carries a 9-plus Tbps backbone, and stays carrier-neutral with 50-plus providers on net, plus a second European presence in Amsterdam. For density buyers, the headline spec is up to 500 watts per square foot.
That density number is the cross-provider gap that matters. A standard 20A/208V full cabinet at HostDime or InterServer delivers roughly 3.3 kW usable, fine for general compute and nowhere near enough for a packed GPU rack. PhoenixNAP's high-density floor is built for exactly the AI-inference and HPC workloads those standard cabinets choke on. Pair that with native carrier density and the case for a single deep Phoenix deployment writes itself. A current promotion runs up to three months of free colocation, which softens the quote-only pricing.
Now the caveat you cannot skip. RadiusDC is acquiring PhoenixNAP's Phoenix colocation business, with the deal expected to close in Q2 2026, the window we are in. Operations continue and PhoenixNAP stays on as a tenant for its bare-metal and network platforms, but the colocation contracts, ブランディング, and roadmap are moving to RadiusDC. If you are signing a multi-year cage lease right now, get assignment and termination language in writing first. If you would rather build a fleet on rented hardware than buy it, weigh a dedicated server plan against the colocation math before committing.
長所:
- Deep compliance: SOC 1/2, PCI DSS, ISO 27001, HIPAA対応
- まで 500 W/sq ft for GPU and HPC density
- キャリアニュートラル, 50-plus providers, 9-plus Tbps backbone
- まで 3 months free on current promo
短所:
- RadiusDC acquisition closing Q2 2026 (contract uncertainty)
- Colocation concentrated in Phoenix (Amsterdam aside)
- No published rack pricing
価格設定: Quote-based; current promo offers up to 3 数ヶ月無料. 複数年契約が一般的, so confirm renewal terms during the RadiusDC transition.
こんな方に最適: GPU, AI, and regulated workloads needing high power density plus a full compliance stack in one Phoenix campus.
次の場合はスキップします: 都市間での地理的な冗長性が必要です, or you are risk-averse about an active ownership change.
評決: 買う フェニックスNAP for dense, compliance-bound Phoenix colocation if you can absorb the RadiusDC handover. If multi-region redundancy outweighs raw density, Rackspace's roughly 40-site spread is the better shape. If you want the same compliance without an M&A cloud overhead, HostDime delivers SOC 2 and HIPAA on a stable owner.
HostDime – Best for Published Pricing on Owned Facilities
Here is the structural edge most colocation brands cannot claim: HostDime designs, ビルド, and operates its own data centers rather than leasing cages inside someone else's. Its Orlando campus at 440 West Kennedy Boulevard runs Tier III today, with a 100,000-square-foot Tier IV facility opening in Q1 2026, rated to withstand a Category 5 hurricane. Los Angeles and Latin American sites extend the map. Owning the buildings is why HostDime can publish what others bury behind a form.
And it does publish. A 1U lists at USD 100/month, 2U at USD 150, and 3U at USD 175. Each comes with a 1 Gbps burstable port (75 Mbps committed), a /29 of five usable IPs, と 24/7 リモートハンド (on-site techs who physically service your gear). Compliance is real and named: SOC 2 タイプⅡ, ヒパア, および PCI DSS. The ladder itself rewards stacking, since the 3U at USD 175 works out to about USD 58 per U against USD 100 for a single 1U. Against InterServer's USD 100 1U, HostDime charges the identical entry but adds the SOC 2 Type II and HIPAA documentation InterServer simply does not provide.
Bandwidth and reach are where it gives ground. それか 75 Mbps committed rate on a single server is modest next to InterServer's bundled 1 Gbps unmetered port, so network-heavy single boxes pay for it. Cabinet and cage pricing moves to quotes, and the footprint leans US Southeast plus Latin America rather than the global spread of a Rackspace or Equinix.
長所:
- 発行済み USD 100-175/month per-U pricing
- Owns and operates its own data centers
- SOC 2 タイプⅡ, ヒパア, PCI DSS documented
- Tier IV Orlando facility opening Q1 2026
短所:
- Single-server bandwidth caps at 75 Mbps committed
- Cabinet pricing is quote-based
- Footprint concentrated in US Southeast and Latin America
価格設定: 1U USD 100, 2U USD 150, 3U USD 175 月額, IPs and remote hands included. Cabinets quote-based. Month-to-month and contract terms available.
こんな方に最適: Regulated single-server to quarter-rack deployments that want real compliance paper at a price you can read upfront.
次の場合はスキップします: You need a gigabit pipe on a single box, or global interconnection across continents.
評決: 選ぶ HostDime for compliance-bound colocation in Orlando or LA where published pricing and owned facilities matter. If a single server needs heavy bandwidth, インターサーバー 1 Gbps beats HostDime's 75 Mbps at the same USD 100. If you need a worldwide interconnection ecosystem, that is Equinix's job, not HostDime's.
Netcup – Best for EU Data Residency on a Budget
Most buyers know Netcup for cheap German VPS and dedicated servers, so the colocation line catches people off guard. It is real, and it is built for one job: keeping European data inside Europe under German jurisdiction. The colocation product runs out of Nuremberg. The smallest published unit is a self-contained 1/3 ラック (14U) with cold-aisle containment and two power rails (3x16A each). Redundant UPS and diesel backup sit behind it, with DE-CIX, N-IX, and AMS-IX peering through the Anexia backbone.
Compliance and sovereignty are the substance here. Netcup holds ISO 9001, ISO 14001, ISO/IEC 27001, およびISO 27701, with GDPR alignment baked in by jurisdiction rather than bolted on for a US audience. The honest spec to weigh is uptime: Netcup guarantees a minimum 99.6% average annual availability, below the roughly 99.98% implied by the Tier III floors at PhoenixNAP and HostDime. On uptime paper the German site sits a tier under that US enterprise pair, a fair trade only if EU residency is the actual requirement.
Two practical frictions. Netcup does not publish colocation rack pricing, and its colocation page geo-blocks non-EU visitors, so price-shopping from outside Europe is awkward. The offering is also small-scale by design, oriented to 1/3-rack segments rather than enterprise cages. For buyers comparing German options specifically, 私たちの guide to colocation in Germany lines up the local alternatives.
長所:
- ISO 27001 + ISO 27701, GDPR by jurisdiction
- Nuremberg site with DE-CIX / AMS-IX ピアリング
- Redundant UPS plus diesel, cold-aisle containment
- Low barrier at the 1/3-rack (14U) ティア
短所:
- No published rack pricing (page geo-blocked outside the EU)
- 99.6% 可用性 guarantee trails Tier III peers
- Small-scale only; no enterprise cages
価格設定: Quote-based; smallest unit is a 1/3 ラック (14U). Entry rate is not published on the EU-restricted page, so confirm it directly before you budget.
こんな方に最適: Small European deployments where German data residency and ISO 27001 are the deciding factors.
次の場合はスキップします: You need enterprise carrier density, Tier IV paper, or you serve mostly US traffic.
評決: 選ぶ ネットカップ when EU data sovereignty and a German legal home are the requirement and the deployment is small. If you need Frankfurt-grade carrier density, Equinix delivers it at several times the rack cost. If you are US-based, skip Netcup; the latency and geo-blocked order flow are not worth fighting.
Hivelocity – Best for Multi-Metro US Coverage
Against ColoCrossing's USD 55 and InterServer's USD 100, Hivelocity's published USD 49 for a 1U is the cheapest single-U rate in this comparison. Each additional U is listed around USD 25. The catch sits next to the headline: power and bandwidth bill on top, それで米ドルは 49 is rack space, not an all-in figure. Read it as the entry to the broadest mid-market US footprint here, not as the final bill.
Breadth is the actual draw. Hivelocity sells colocation across 13 US facilities, including paired sites in Los Angeles, ニューヨーク, and Tampa that allow intra-metro redundancy without leaving one provider. Compliance covers SSAE-16 SOC 1 タイプ 1 およびSOC 2 タイプ 1, ヒパア, and PCI, backed by diesel power redundancy, CRAC cooling, and overhead plus sub-floor fire suppression. Picture one cabinet in Dallas, ニューヨークに1つ, and one in LA, all under a single contract and support portal. That spread is hard to match at this price tier.
2 つの正直なメモ. The main colocation page keeps allocations above 1U on quotes, so the published USD 49 is the small-deployment teaser, not a full menu. And Hivelocity's footprint is US-only, which rules it out the moment EU residency or APAC latency enters the brief. SLA percentages and remote-hands rates are not stated on the colocation page, so confirm both before you commit a production workload.
長所:
- Cheapest published 米ドル 49 1U この比較では
- 13 US metros with dual-site options in LA, NYC, タンパ
- SOC 1 + SOC 2, ヒパア, PCI ドキュメント
- Unified billing and support across all sites
短所:
- Power and bandwidth billed on top of the USD 49 rack rate
- SLA % and remote-hands rates not published
- US-only footprint
価格設定: 1U from USD 49/month, additional U around USD 25; power and bandwidth separate. Larger allocations quote-based.
こんな方に最適: Buyers placing servers in three to five US metros who want one contract and one support queue.
次の場合はスキップします: You need an all-in published price, a single Tier IV owned facility, or any non-US region.
評決: 選ぶ Hivelocity when US geographic spread beats single-site depth. If you need one owned Tier IV facility with formal HIPAA attestation, HostDime is the cleaner buy. If you want the rock-bottom single rate and can skip compliance paper, ColoCrossing sits USD 6 higher but in the same budget lane.
ColoCrossing – Best for Cheap US Single-Server Colocation
米ドル 55 月, ラックスペース, パワー, and a network port included. ColoCrossing's entire pitch is the low end of US colocation: a 1U from USD 55 (米ドル 59 in its Los Angeles facility). Volume discounts kick in as you scale to cabinets and cages. It runs multiple US data centers and bundles 24/7 実践的なサポート, with remote hands and expanded ports as add-ons. For a hobbyist, a small SaaS, or anyone parking one or two boxes, the barrier to entry is about as low as colocation gets.
価格について, ColoCrossing sits in the budget bracket's middle seat. 米ドルで 55 for a 1U, it sits USD 6 above Hivelocity's USD 49 floor and USD 45 under InterServer's USD 100. That middle seat is a credible pick when the cheapest published rate is the goal and you do not need InterServer's bundled gigabit port. Custom cage and private-cloud builds are available for tenants who outgrow a single server.
Documentation is the weak spot. ColoCrossing publishes thin detail on certifications, Tier rating, and SLA percentages, so compliance-bound buyers will not find the attestation paper they need on the public pages. Treat it as a budget-tier provider rather than an enterprise one, and verify any spec your workload depends on before signing.
長所:
- Low published entry: USD 55/month 1U
- Power and network bundled into the rate
- 24/7 hands-on support included
- Custom cage and private builds available
短所:
- Thin published compliance, ティア, and SLA detail
- Budget-tier brand, not enterprise positioning
- US-only facilities
価格設定: 1U from USD 55/month (米ドル 59 in Los Angeles), power and network included. Volume discounts for cabinets and cages.
こんな方に最適: Cost-driven single-server US deployments where formal compliance is not on the checklist.
次の場合はスキップします: You need SOC 2 or HIPAA attestations, a stated SLA, or a non-US region.
評決: 選ぶ ColoCrossing for the cheapest US single-server colocation when audit paperwork is not a requirement. If you need SOC 2 Type II or HIPAA, HostDime is the only honest answer here. If you want more metros under one SLA, Hivelocity's 13-site network covers redundancy ColoCrossing cannot.
Equinix – Best for Global Interconnection
Equinix will not sell you a single rack, and it will not tell you the price until you talk to sales. そこから始めましょう, because it filters out most buyers reading a budget comparison. What Equinix sells is interconnection: 260-plus IBX facilities (its International Business Exchange data centers) across 70-plus metros on six continents, knitted together by Equinix Fabric. Each site carries dedicated power, 24/7 リモートハンド, and broad SOC, ISO, PCI, and HIPAA coverage. You are buying proximity to thousands of networks and cloud on-ramps, not floor space.
The premium is real and the math is blunt. Industry estimates put a 5 kW cabinet in a Tier-1 Equinix metro at roughly USD 1,500 to USD 3,000/month, which is 1.3x to 2.5x InterServer's USD 1,200 full 48U cabinet. Nobody pays that for the concrete. They pay it because one cross-connect inside an IBX can reach carriers, exchanges, およびAWS, Azure, and Google Cloud on-ramps that simply are not present in a budget facility. Where Rackspace runs around 40 データセンター, Equinix's 260-plus is the widest interconnection map in the market.
So the fit is narrow but decisive. For a CDN, a financial-trading platform, a peering-dependent network, or an enterprise whose value comes from who it can connect to, Equinix is close to mandatory. For a buyer who just needs a server in a building with an internet pipe, it is wildly overspecified, and every other provider here costs less.
長所:
- 260-plus IBX facilities across 70-plus metros
- Equinix Fabric interconnection to clouds and carriers
- Broad SOC, ISO, PCI, HIPAA coverage
- The global benchmark for peering density
短所:
- プレミアム価格, quote-only, cross-connects billed separately
- Overspecified for simple rack-space needs
- No single-server retail product
価格設定: Quote-only. Industry estimate for a 5 kW cabinet runs USD 1,500-3,000/month in Tier-1 metros; cross-connects extra. That cabinet figure is a third-party estimate, not a published Equinix rate.
こんな方に最適: ネットワーク, CDN, ファイナンス, and cloud-dependent enterprises where interconnection value exceeds rack cost.
次の場合はスキップします: You need rack space with a generic internet uplink and a price you can read today.
評決: 選ぶ エクイニクス when your business model is interconnection and price is the secondary concern. If you only need a rack and a pipe, every other provider in this guide is cheaper and faster to turn up. If you want global reach with managed help instead of raw cross-connects, Rackspace is the more practical fit.
InterServer
