Alternativas de alojamiento de AWS (2026): 12 Proveedores con facturas que realmente puedes predecir - ES
en julio 15, 2025, AWS retiró la capa gratuita que lanzó un millón de proyectos paralelos. Las cuentas nuevas ya no reciben 12 meses de un t3.micro gratis. Llegan hasta USD 200 in credits and a sandbox that shuts itself off after six months or once the credits run dry, whichever lands first. For a lot of small teams, that was the last thread holding them to the platform. los 12 proveedores de alojamiento en la nube below price compute, almacenamiento, and bandwidth so the total shows up on one invoice you can forecast.
respuesta rapida: Kamatera and Linode (now Akamai Connected Cloud) are the tightest pure-IaaS swaps for EC2, both roughly half the effective rate with no renewal games. DigitalOcean is the pick if developer experience is the pain. IONOS is the one EU-regulated buyers can actually use. Cloudways is the wildcard: it runs your app on AWS itself, then hands you a flat bill instead of a 14-line console.
Saltar a: Interesar | Hostinger | InterServer | Alojamiento.com (A2) | Hostwinds | Cloudways | Web líquida | AccuWebHosting | IÓNICO | DigitalOcean | Bluehost | Linode (Akamai) | Cómo elegir | Preguntas más frecuentes
Última revisión: julio 2026. Prices and policies verified against provider pages on 2026-07-03.
Cómo seleccionamos a estos proveedores
Every number below came off a live pricing page or an official policy doc on July 3, 2026. Nothing here is pulled from an old spec sheet, and where a figure couldn't be confirmed on a current page, you'll see us say so instead of guessing.
The bar to make this list: at least one product line with published usage billing (per-hour or per-second, the model AWS people are used to) or a flat rate locked against renewal hikes, plus a minimum of three verifiable regions. We scored four things, weighted for this angle: how predictable the monthly bill is, how far the effective rate sits below EC2-equivalent compute, how many real cloud primitives you get (calcular, almacenamiento de objetos, bases de datos administradas), and whether the trial or refund matches the spirit of the old AWS Free Tier. A promo rate that triples at renewal disqualifies a provider from any "más económico" afirmar, so we tracked entry-to-renewal multipliers by hand.
lo que no hicimos: run synthetic load tests against EC2, simulate your real egress pattern, or judge 3am support from a single ticket. Two strong AWS alternatives sit outside the 12 only because the list caps at 12: Vultr (32 regiones, facturación por segundo, Entrada USD 2.50/mes) and Hetzner Cloud, which often beats everyone here on raw price-to-performance for European workloads. Shop both if you're serious.
| Proveedor de alojamiento | Comentarios | Calificación general | Comienza desde |
|---|---|---|---|
1  Interesar
|
320 |
|
$4.00 / mo. 30 dias libres |
2  Hostinger
|
63.2k + |
|
$1.95 / mo. 80% Apagado |
3  InterServer
|
2.3k + |
|
$2.50 / mo. AHORA 65% apagado |
4  Alojamiento A2
|
3.4k + |
|
$1.95 / mo. AHORA -76% |
5  Hostwinds
|
1.5k + |
|
$4.99 / mo. |
6  Cloudways
|
3.4k + |
|
$11.00 / mo. |
7  líquido web inc.
|
2.8k + |
|
$5.00 / mo. hasta -55% |
8  AccuWebHosting
|
242 |
|
$1.99 / mo. VPS de divisas -33.40% |
9  IÓNICO | ionos.com
|
38.1k + |
|
$1.00 / mo. |
10  Océano digital
|
1.9k + |
|
$5.00 / mo. |
11  Bluehost
|
28.1k + |
|
$1.99 / mo. -70% AHORA |
12  Linode
|
242 |
|
$5.00 / mo. |
1. Kamatera
320
4.2
Positivo
Positivo
Interesar: Best Pure-IaaS Swap for EC2
Desde USD 4/mes | 20+ centros de datos | 30-día de prueba, Dólar estadounidense 100 crédito
Dólar estadounidense 4. Eso es un 1 vCPU, 1 GB de RAM, 20 GB SSD build, and the nearest EC2 equivalent (a t3.micro on-demand) runs about USD 7.59/mo before you attach a single EBS volume or move a byte out. Kamatera bills hourly from USD 0.005/hr and meters by the second, so a 40-minute batch job costs you 40 minutos. That's the EC2 billing model, at close to half the underlying rate.
The hardware sits in 20+ centros de datos que abarcan América del Norte, Europa, el medio Oriente, Asia, y Australia, and you build servers à la carte: any mix from 1 a 104 vCPU y 1 a 512 GB de RAM, resized mid-month with the cost prorated. Compared to Linode's USD 5 Nanode later in this list, USD de Kamatera 4 entry undercuts it by 20%, and where Linode locks you into fixed tiers, Kamatera lets you dial in an odd 3 vCPU / 6 GB shape if that's what your workload wants.
Aquí está el comercio. There's no Lambda, no RDS-grade managed-database catalogue, no object store that matches S3 feature-for-feature. Kamatera's managed add-on runs USD 50/mo on top of the server, which fixes the "no sysadmin" problem but pushes you well past the headline price. The trial is the redeeming detail for anyone nervous about switching: Dólar estadounidense 100 in credit plus 1 TB of traffic for 30 days is enough to actually load-test a real workload before you commit a card.
Pros
- Per-second billing matches EC2 granularity exactly
- Fully custom resource shapes (no forced tier jumps)
- 20+ regions hitting every major market
- Dólar estadounidense 100 trial credit covers real testing
Contras
- No AWS-parity managed services (lambda, RDS, S3)
- Managed add-on costs USD 50/mo extra
- Control panel is functional, not pretty
Precios: Desde USD 4/mes (1 vCPU, 1 GB, 20 GB SSD). Hourly from USD 0.005/hr, facturado por segundo. Extra traffic USD 0.01/GB, extra storage USD 0.05/GB/mo. No promo-to-renewal jump.
Mejor para: Teams whose AWS bill is mostly EC2 plus attached storage, with the DevOps skills to run their own box.
Saltar si: You lean on Lambda, RDS, or S3 features. Go to IONOS or DigitalOcean, both carry deeper primitives.
Kamatera is the closest like-for-like if your workload is compute with a few volumes bolted on. The savings are real and the billing is honest. Choose it over Linode when per-second parity and US-region density matter more than raw region count; if you need 40-plus regions, jump to Linode instead.
2. Hostinger
63.2k +
4.6
Positivo
Positivo
Hostinger: Best Exit If You Never Needed AWS
Inicio en la nube USD 7,99/mes (48-mo) | Renueva USD 25.99/mes | 30-reembolso del día
Let's be blunt about what this is not. Hostinger Cloud has no provisioning API, no per-hour billing, no autoscaling group, no S3-compatible bucket. If your problem is genuinely AWS-shaped, sigue desplazándote. But plenty of people landed on AWS for a WordPress site and a contact form, and for them the honest fix is to leave the whole model behind for a control panel and a flat rate.
Cloud Startup packs 4 Núcleos de CPU, 4 GB de RAM, y 100 GB NVMe for USD 7.99/mo on a 48-month commit, and it'll host up to 100 sitios con 100 trabajadores PHP, good for roughly 200,000 visitas al mes. Bundled in: dominio gratis año uno, SSL, correo electrónico, copias de seguridad diarias, y filtrado DDoS, all driven from the hPanel dashboard without a terminal in sight. Comparable compute on AWS would mean an m5-class instance running well over USD 100/mo on demand.
La renovación es donde muerde., and it bites hard. ese dólar 7.99 sube a USD 25,99/mes when the term rolls, un levantamiento de 3,25x, which drags your true four-year average to around USD 17/mo. Stack that against InterServer's USD 3 slice later in this list: Hostinger's renewal alone is 8.7x InterServer's price-locked rate. Where Hostinger wins that trade is convenience and reach, with data centers across the US, Europa, Asia, and South America versus InterServer's US-only footprint.
Pros
- 4 núcleos y 4 GB de RAM en el nivel de entrada
- hPanel removes server admin entirely
- Global regions across four continents
- Dominio gratuito, SSL, and daily backups bundled
Contras
- Not real IaaS (no API, no hourly billing)
- Renovación en USD 25,99/mes is 3.25x the promo
- La tarifa más baja necesita un 48-mes prepago
Precios: Inicio en la nube USD 7,99/mes (48-mo, renueva USD 25.99). Profesional en la nube USD 15,99/mes. Empresa en la nube USD 29,99/mes. Higher-tier renewal rates aren't published. 30-día de devolución de dinero.
Mejor para: WordPress or PHP owners who got pulled onto AWS by mistake and want a managed flat rate.
Saltar si: You need provisioning APIs, escalado automático, or root. DigitalOcean or Linode are built for that.
Buy Hostinger if you never should have been on AWS in the first place and you want the simplest possible landing. If you need actual cloud primitives, this isn't your tool; look at Kamatera or DigitalOcean, and price in that renewal before the 48-month button.
3. InterServer
2.3k +
4.4
Positivo
Positivo
InterServer: Best for a Bill That Never Moves
USD 3/mo per slice | Price-locked for life | centros de datos de EE. UU.
Where Hostinger's invoice triples at renewal, InterServer's never budges. You pay USD 3/mo for one slice (1 núcleo, 2 GB de RAM, 40 GB SSD, 2 TB transfer on a 10 Puerto Gbps), and that number is the number for as long as the account exists. No year-two surprise, no reserved-instance math to lock a discount. AWS makes you commit one or three years upfront to buy down the rate; InterServer just skips the negotiation.
Scaling is the second half of the pitch, and it's refreshingly dumb: need more, add a slice. Each one stacks another core, 2 GB de RAM, 40 GB SSD, y 2 TB de transferencia, straight-lining to 32 slices at USD 96/mo (32 núcleos, 64 GB de RAM, 1.28 SSD de TB, y 64 TB de ancho de banda). That last figure is the quiet headline. The same 64 TB of egress on AWS, even after the free 100 GB, tiers out to over USD 5,000 un mes. Comprar 8 or more slices and managed support is thrown in.
Geography is the ceiling. Three US regions (ciudad de nueva york, Dallas, Los Angeles) and nothing abroad, so any audience outside North America eats the latency. One more thing to know before you sign: there's no refund window on VPS because provisioning is instant, though it's month-to-month, so you can walk anytime. En USD 3 a slice, InterServer undercuts both Kamatera and DigitalOcean's USD 4 entries while handing you more RAM and storage per dollar.
Pros
- Price-locked for life en cada plan
- Escalado de corte lineal, no tier cliffs
- 64 TB bandwidth at the top tier
- Managed support free at 8+ rebanadas
Contras
- Sólo EE. UU. (Nueva York, Dallas, LA)
- No managed-services catalogue
- Sin ventana de reembolso en VPS
Precios: USD 3/mo per slice, linear to USD 96/mo for 32 rebanadas. Windows VPS priced higher for licensing. Identical rates on monthly, semestral, anual, and two-year cycles. Signup price locked for life. Sin garantía de devolución de dinero.
Mejor para: US-centric teams who want EC2-class compute at a fixed cost and refuse to ever redo the pricing math.
Saltar si: Your users sit outside North America. Take Linode's 41 regions or Kamatera's 20+ en lugar.
InterServer isn't chasing AWS; it's the opposite creed. Pick the cheapest predictable slice, then stop thinking about the invoice forever. For a US workload, that beats 32 regions you'll never route traffic to. For anything global, Linode is the smarter buy.
4. A2 Hosting
3.4k +
4.5
Positivo
Positivo
Alojamiento.com (anteriormente Alojamiento A2): Best Managed VPS Security Bundle
Nota: A2 Hosting fue adquirida por World Host Group en enero 2025 and rebranded to Hosting.com on April 28, 2025. Older reviews still filed under "Alojamiento A2" describe a product line that has since changed.
VPS no administrado desde USD 4,99/mes | Managed from USD 38/mo | AMD EPYC + NVMe
Say you run a Magento store and a couple of client WordPress sites, and your AWS bill is mostly EC2 hours plus the WAF you bolted on from AWS Marketplace. Hosting.com's managed VPS folds that security layer into the base price: cortafuegos de aplicaciones web, brute-force detection, escaneo de malware, and daily backups with 30-day restore, all on AMD EPYC hardware with Samsung NVMe. You're not assembling primitives; you're buying a hardened box someone else patches.
Two products matter here. The unmanaged VPS starts at USD 4,99/mes para 2 núcleos, 4 GB de RAM, y 80 GB NVMe. The managed Linux VPS, where the security bundle lives, abre en USD 38/mo. For a nickel less than Hostwinds' USD 5 servidor en la nube, ese dólar 4.99 unmanaged tier hands you four times the RAM (4 GB against 1 GB) and nearly triple the storage. The honest gap is billing: this is a flat-term subscription, not per-hour cloud, so it won't scale to zero for a burst job the way EC2 or Kamatera will.
One caution we won't paper over: Hosting.com does not publish renewal pricing on the current product pages, and A2's history of steep post-term rates is well documented. Treat the intro number as the intro number and confirm the renewal with sales before a long commit. The brand is also mid-transition, so some documentation still points at legacy a2hosting.com URLs.
Pros
- Paquete de seguridad (WAF, escaneo de malware) baked in
- VPS no administrado de USD 4,99/mes (4 GB de RAM)
- AMD EPYC plus Samsung NVMe hardware
- Copias de seguridad diarias con restauración de 30 días
Contras
- Precios de renovación no publicado
- Flat-term billing, no per-hour scaling
- Brand transition still settling
Precios: VPS no administrado desde USD 4,99/mes (2 núcleos, 4 GB, 80 GB NVMe). VPS Linux administrado desde USD 38/mes. Renewal rates not published on current pages. Money-back terms unconfirmed at review time.
Mejor para: Teams that want a managed, security-hardened VPS and would rather not run their own firewall stack.
Saltar si: You need per-hour billing or transparent renewal pricing. Kamatera and DigitalOcean give you both.
Choose Hosting.com when a bundled security layer on managed NVMe is worth a flat monthly rate. If you want elastic per-second billing, this is the wrong shelf; Kamatera or Linode fit better. And if unpublished renewals make you nervous, InterServer's price-lock removes that question entirely.
5. Hostwinds
1.5k +
4.4
Positivo
Positivo
Hostwinds: Best Cheap Hourly Cloud
~USD 5/mo | USD 0.006931/hr | 3 centros de datos | facturación por horas
Dólar estadounidense 0.006931 una hora. That's a Hostwinds cloud server (1 UPC, 1 GB de RAM, 30 GB de almacenamiento, 1 Transferencia de TB), billed by the hour, which works out to roughly a third of a comparable EC2 t3.small on demand. No spot-price volatility, no reserved-instance lock-in, y el 1 TB of transfer is bundled so there's no separate egress line at all. For build agents, trabajos por lotes, and test environments that live for minutes, that matches AWS's flexibility while deleting the spreadsheet.
Against Cloudways' USD 11 DigitalOcean tier further down, USD de Hostwinds 5 entry comes in about 55% cheaper and still hands you root, though Cloudways layers on managed support that Hostwinds doesn't. You can run Hostwinds monthly or pure pay-as-you-go, with nightly backups, an enterprise firewall, y 1 Gbps ports on every server.
Three data centers is where it thins out: Dallas, Seattle, y Amsterdam, punto final. Sin Asia-Pacífico, nada de america latina. For US and Western Europe that's fine; for anything else the latency will show. el anunciado 99.9999% uptime target reads more like marketing than a contract, so treat it as aspiration, not guarantee. Worth knowing for the long term: HostPapa completed its acquisition of Hostwinds on April 29, 2026, so the roadmap now sits inside a larger group.
Pros
- Facturación por horas from USD 0.006931/hr
- 1 TB transfer bundled per server
- Monthly and pay-as-you-go both offered
- Acceso raíz, copias de seguridad nocturnas, 1 Puertos Gbps
Contras
- Solamente 3 centros de datos
- No Asia-Pacific or Latin America
- Six-nines SLA is a target, no es una promesa
Precios: Cloud servers from USD 0.006931/hr (about USD 5/mo) para 1 GB / 1 UPC / 1 Transferencia de TB. No renewal markup on published rates. Multi-year discounts available.
Mejor para: Burst workloads and CI pipelines that want EC2-style pay-per-use without EC2-style invoices.
Saltar si: You need Asia-Pacific or Latin America latency. Linode or Kamatera cover far more ground.
Hostwinds is a budget cloud that copied the AWS billing model without the AWS sprawl. Buy it for cheap ephemeral compute in the US or EU. If your users are global, the three-region ceiling forces you toward Linode or Kamatera regardless of the price gap.
6. Cloudways
3.4k +
4.5
Positivo
Positivo
Cloudways: Best for Running AWS Without the AWS Console
DigitalOcean desde USD 11/mes | AWS desde USD 38,56/mes | Cada hora, sin contrato | 99.99% LECHUGA
Here's the twist most lists miss: Cloudways isn't a rival to AWS so much as a friendlier front desk for it. It's a managed layer that provisions your app on top of DigitalOcean, Vultr, Linode, AWS, o Google Cloud, then wraps the whole thing in support, copias de seguridad, and one flat bill. Pick AWS as the engine and you're literally on EC2, just paying Cloudways a predictable rate instead of decoding a metered invoice.
The numbers tell you which engine to pick. DigitalOcean-backed plans start at USD 11/mes (2 GB de RAM, 1 vCPU, 50 GB), while the AWS-backed plan opens at USD 38,56/mes and Google Cloud at USD 37.45/mo. So Cloudways' own AWS tier costs about 3.5x its DigitalOcean tier for broadly similar compute, which tells you the DigitalOcean route is the value play unless you specifically need AWS underneath. Para perspectiva, ese dólar 38.56 AWS plan runs close to 10x Kamatera's USD 4 entrada no administrada; the gap is the managed layer and the AWS name, no el silicio. Billing is hourly with monthly settlement, sin contrato, and stopped servers stop charging. There's no promo-to-renewal jump; Dólar estadounidense 11 se queda en USD 11.
Dos capturas. The AWS and GCP plans bundle only 2 GB de ancho de banda, and overages bill at AWS's USD 0.12/GB, so a chatty app can blow past the base fast. And you get no root on the managed stack, plus a curated slice of AWS rather than the full Lambda/RDS/IAM catalogue. La prueba gratuita de 3 días (sin tarjeta) es real, but it doesn't apply to the AWS or GCP plans, so validate on DigitalOcean first.
Pros
- Run on AWS or GCP with a single flat bill
- DigitalOcean-backed plans from USD 11/mo
- Cada hora, sin contrato, sin acantilado de renovación
- 24/7 soporte gestionado, copias de seguridad, SSL incluido
Contras
- AWS/GCP plans bundle only 2 GB de ancho de banda
- No root on the managed stack
- Free trial excludes AWS and GCP plans
Precios: DigitalOcean desde USD 11/mes (Dólar estadounidense 8.25 en anual). AWS desde USD 38,56/mes. Google Cloud desde USD 37,45/mes. Facturación por horas, monthly settlement, sin margen de renovación. 3-day free trial on DigitalOcean and Vultr plans.
Mejor para: Agencies and freelancers who want AWS-grade infrastructure but one human-supported invoice instead of a solutions architect on call.
Saltar si: Necesitas raíz, deep AWS service integration, or genuinely cheap raw compute. Go DigitalOcean or Kamatera direct.
Cloudways answers one specific question well: "I want AWS, minus the AWS console." si ese eres tu, the management premium earns its keep. If you actually like the console, or you just want the cheapest box, this markup makes no sense; DigitalOcean direct is USD 4 and Kamatera is USD 4 with per-second billing.
7. Liquid Web Inc.
2.8k +
4.5
Positivo
Positivo
Web líquida: Best High-Touch Managed Cloud
Managed Linux from USD 33/mo | 100% tiempo de actividad SLA, 10x credito | centros de datos de EE. UU.
Ignore the USD 3.50/mo headline; es cebo. That's Liquid Web's self-managed VPS, a bare box with no support layer and nothing that competes with AWS beyond raw resources. The product that actually earns its place against EC2-plus-managed-tooling is the managed tier, and that starts at USD 33/mes for the Essential plan (2 GB de RAM, 40 GB SSD, 10 Transferencia de TB). Read the real entry as USD 33, no USD 3.50. Not sure which side of that line you sit on? Nuestro Guía de VPS administrado versus no administrado lays out who should pay for hands-off ops and who shouldn't.
What the managed price buys is the pitch: una 100% network and power uptime SLA backed by a 1,000% downtime credit (an hour down earns ten hours of credit), staffed human support, monitoreo proactivo, y copias de seguridad administradas. That's roughly 3x Cloudways' USD 11 DigitalOcean tier, but Cloudways is a thin layer over IaaS while Liquid Web fully operates the box. For a production workload where a 30-minute outage costs more than the year's hosting, that SLA math holds up.
The limits are geography and model. Data centers are primarily US-based (Lansing and Southfield in Michigan, Phoenix in Arizona), so this fails a hard EU or Asia data-residency requirement out of the gate. And there's no per-second elastic billing here; it's flat managed hosting, not scale-to-zero cloud. Pricing holds flat with no renewal trap, and new managed accounts get a 30-day money-back window.
Pros
- 100% tiempo de actividad SLA con crédito 10x
- Human support, no first-tier scripts
- Precio fijo, sin salto de renovación
- 30-day money-back on managed plans
Contras
- La entrada real es USD 33/mes, no USD 3.50
- Primarily US data centers
- No per-second or scale-to-zero billing
Precios: VPS autoadministrable desde USD 3.50/mes (desnudo). Managed Linux VPS from USD 33/mo. Managed Windows from USD 86.50/mo. 30-day money-back on managed plans.
Mejor para: Mid-market production workloads where uptime guarantees and real support beat per-minute billing.
Saltar si: You're price-sensitive or need non-US regions. Kamatera or Linode fit better, and IONOS covers EU residency.
Liquid Web sells support and uptime, not cheap compute, and it's honest about that. Buy it when downtime is your most expensive line item. If entry price or global regions drive the decision, this is the wrong provider; Bahía y Kamatera, Linode, o IONOS en su lugar.
8. AccuWebHosting
242
4.4
Positivo
Positivo
AccuWebHosting: Best Geographic Spread Per Dollar
Traditional VPS from USD 4.99/mo | 12 países, 16+ ubicaciones | 99.9% LECHUGA
Sixteen-plus data center locations across 12 países, entry VPS at USD 4.99/mo, and no surcharge for picking a specific region. That's the AccuWebHosting pitch in one line, y es real: most clouds (AWS included) charge a regional uplift, and AccuWebHosting doesn't. Against Hostwinds' 3 locations and Liquid Web's US-only map, 16-plus is a serious spread for a workload that has to sit near users in, decir, Hyderabad and Frankfurt at once.
The confusing part is the two-brand setup. AccuWebHosting is the traditional VPS line; AccuWeb.Cloud is a separate pay-as-you-go IaaS brand built on cloudlets that auto-scale, starting near USD 1.80/mo and billing storage at USD 0.02246/GB after 10 GB free. AccuWeb.Cloud's own pricing page claims a 16 vCPU / 32 GB / 50 GB build runs USD 97.20 against AWS's USD 294.44 for the same shape. It's a vendor comparison, so weigh it as one, but the elastic model is genuine and the closest thing here to EC2's meter.
Watch the refund asymmetry. The traditional VPS line gives you only a 7-day money-back window, unusually short next to the 30-day norm from Liquid Web and IONOS. AccuWeb.Cloud instead offers a "40% savings or your money back" garantía. Si estas evaluando, start on AccuWeb.Cloud, validar, entonces decide, rather than burning the 7-day clock on the traditional VPS.
Pros
- 16+ ubicaciones a través de 12 países
- No regional surcharge
- Estándar de almacenamiento NVMe
- Elastic cloudlet billing on AccuWeb.Cloud
Contras
- Solamente 7-reembolso del día on traditional VPS
- Two-brand structure is confusing
- El precio de renovación no está claramente publicado
Precios: Traditional VPS from USD 4.99/mo (NVMe). AccuWeb.Cloud IaaS from about USD 1.80/mo, cloudlet-based, storage USD 0.02246/GB/mo after 10 GB free. 99.9% LECHUGA. Traditional VPS 7-day refund.
Mejor para: Multi-region audiences (India/EU/US splits) where regional latency matters but AWS uplifts hurt.
Saltar si: You want a long evaluation window on the traditional line. Use the AccuWeb.Cloud path, or take Liquid Web's 30 dias.
AccuWebHosting wins the geography-per-dollar contest most providers underplay. Buy it for multi-region reach on a budget. If a longer trial or a single clean brand matters more, DigitalOcean or Liquid Web are the tidier choices.
9. IONOS | ionos.com
38.1k +
4.3
Positivo
Positivo
IÓNICO: Lo mejor para la soberanía de datos de la UE
Compute Engine USD 0.013/vCPU/hr | Cloud Cubes XS ~USD 5.76/mo | Residencia de datos de la UE
The US CLOUD Act lets American authorities compel data from US-headquartered providers wherever that data physically sits, AWS EU regions included. If you run regulated data (cuidado de la salud, fintech, public sector), that's not a footnote, it's a disqualifier. IONOS is a German company running its core cloud from Frankfurt and Berlin, con cumplimiento del RGPD por defecto, annual BSI-C5 attestation (Germany's federal cloud-security audit standard), and EU data residency written into the contract. That's the entire reason to be here, and it's a guarantee AWS structurally cannot make.
The IaaS underneath is real, not a compliance shell. Cloud Compute Engine bills per minute at USD 0.013/vCPU/hour plus USD 0.0022/GB/hour for RAM on flexible cores, with dedicated AMD EPYC and Intel Xeon cores priced higher. Prefer fixed shapes? Cloud Cubes XS runs USD 0.008/hr, about USD 5.76/mo for 1 vCPU, 2 GB, y 60 GB. That XS sits roughly 44% above Kamatera's USD 4 entrada, and you're paying that gap for EU jurisdiction, not extra compute. A cheaper VPS line opens at USD 2/mo, though its larger tiers carry the usual 2-3x renewal, so the XS is the clean pick.
IONOS itself puts vCPU pricing up to 25% below the US hyperscalers, and the DE and UK data centers run on 100% energía renovable. The honest gaps: the managed-service catalogue is narrower than AWS (no Lambda, no managed AI/ML depth), and we could not verify a current uptime SLA figure on the pricing pages this session, so confirm your specific SLA needs with IONOS before committing.
Pros
- Soberanía de datos de la UE (CLOUD Act resistant)
- Per-minute billing at USD 0.013/vCPU/hour
- BSI-C5 attested, RGPD por defecto
- Pila completa: calcular, Kubernetes, almacenamiento de objetos
Contras
- Narrower catalogue (no Lambda/AI parity)
- Current uptime SLA figure no publicado
- VPS S-tier and up renew at 2-3x
Precios: Compute Engine USD 0.013/vCPU/hour + USD 0.0022/GB/hour RAM (flexible). Cloud Cubes XS USD 0.008/hr (about USD 5.76/mo). VPS desde USD 2/mes (XS has no renewal split). Savings Plans cut RAM cost on 1-3 términos anuales. VPS 30-day money-back.
Mejor para: EU-regulated workloads where CLOUD Act exposure on AWS is a compliance dealbreaker.
Saltar si: You depend on AWS-specific managed services. Cloudways or DigitalOcean cover those better for non-regulated buyers.
For EU sovereignty, IONOS is the cleanest answer on this list, punto final. Buy it when jurisdiction is the requirement, no es agradable tenerlo. Outside that, it's a capable but not category-leading IaaS, and DigitalOcean or Linode will feel smoother for a US or global build.
10. Digital Ocean
1.9k +
3.7
Neutral
Neutral
DigitalOcean: La mejor experiencia para desarrolladores
Droplet Básico desde USD 4/mes | Facturación por segundo | 99.99% LECHUGA | Dólar estadounidense 200 crédito
Three microservices, a Postgres database, an object store for uploads, and a preview environment per pull request. On AWS that's an EC2 fleet, RDS, S3, a VPC, and an IAM policy nobody wants to own. On DigitalOcean it's a few Droplets from USD 4/mes, a managed Postgres from USD 15/mo, and a Spaces bucket at USD 5/mo, wired up in an afternoon. Same stack, a fraction of the console.
DigitalOcean built its name on exactly this substitution. Droplets stand in for EC2, Spaces for S3 (and it's S3-compatible, so existing SDKs just work), Managed Databases for RDS, App Platform for Beanstalk. A partir de enero 1, 2026 billing moved to per-second with a 60-second minimum, capped at the monthly rate, so you never pay above the listed price. The Basic Droplet matches Kamatera's USD 4 entry to the dollar, but it bundles 500 GB of transfer where AWS starts metering egress past 100 GB. Spaces is the sharper deal: USD 5/mes por 250 GiB plus 1 TiB outbound with a CDN included, where S3 plus CloudFront for the same usage runs higher.
The footprint is the honest limit: alrededor 9 self-serve regions (14 centros de datos) against Linode's 41 and AWS's 30-plus. The managed-services catalogue is thinner too; Functions exist, but there's no SageMaker-scale ecosystem. For most app teams that's irrelevant. If your stack leans on the deep AWS catalogue, it's a wall. Las cuentas nuevas obtienen USD 200 in credit for 60 dias, double Linode's USD 100.
Pros
- Facturación por segundo (60-sec min, tope mensual)
- S3-compatible Spaces with CDN at USD 5/mo
- Dólar estadounidense 200 crédito por 60 dias
- 99.99% SLA de gotas, precios transparentes
Contras
- Solamente 9 regiones (Linode tiene 41)
- Thinner managed-services catalogue than AWS
- Sin reembolso tradicional (basado en crédito)
Precios: Basic Droplet USD 4/mo (512 MiB, 1 vCPU, 10 Gibraltar, 500 GiB transfer). Postgres administrado desde USD 15/mes. Spaces USD 5/mo (250 Gibraltar + 1 TiB + CDN). Per-second billing since Jan 1, 2026, capped monthly.
Mejor para: Solo devs and small teams running an app, a database, and an object store who want AWS primitives with a navigable console.
Saltar si: You depend on AWS-specific services or need 40-plus regions. Linode covers the regions.
DigitalOcean is what AWS might look like if it only shipped the eight services most teams actually use. Buy it for developer speed on a clean stack. If you need deep AWS services or global region density, that's the line where you pick Linode, or stay put.
11. Bluehost
28.1k +
4.1
Positivo
Neutral
Bluehost: Honest About the Fit
Cloud Boutique from USD 75/mo | 100% SLA de tiempo de actividad de la red | WordPress administrado
Start with the disqualifier: Bluehost Cloud is not an IaaS and not an EC2 replacement. No compute API, no S3 equivalent, no per-hour billing. It's a managed WordPress and agency platform built on WP Cloud with a Cloudflare Enterprise CDN, conmutación por error automática, y copias de seguridad diarias. Si tu carga de trabajo es "I run WordPress and an AWS-alternatives search dropped me here," stay a minute. Otherwise skip to Linode.
Priced within that scope, it's a premium product. The Cloud Boutique tier (10 sitios, 125 GB SSD, 20 vCPU) es USD 75/mo en anual, Dólar estadounidense 90 mes a mes; Firm is USD 155/mo and Agency USD 250/mo. That Boutique rate is 6.8x Cloudways' USD 11 DigitalOcean plan and 9.4x Hostinger's USD 7.99 entrada, so you're paying for the managed-WordPress polish and the SLA, no valor bruto. The standout is a genuine 100% SLA de tiempo de actividad de la red. The catch buyers miss: Bluehost Cloud is excluded from the 30-day money-back guarantee, so there's no easy exit once you're in.
The separate VPS line runs new AMD EPYC, DDR5, and NVMe hardware, but the entry plan renews at USD 54,99/mes (2 vCPU, 4 GB, 100 GB), and Bluehost only publishes that renewal rate, not a transparent intro, so budget for the higher number. Data centers are primarily US-based, with multi-region detail left vague.
Pros
- 100% SLA de tiempo de actividad de la red en la nube
- CDN empresarial de Cloudflare incluido
- Copias de seguridad diarias, conmutación por error automática
- New EPYC/DDR5/NVMe VPS hardware
Contras
- Not real IaaS (no API, no hourly billing)
- Cloud excluded from the 30-day refund
- VPS renews at USD 54,99/mes entrada
Precios: Cloud Boutique USD 75/mo annual (Dólar estadounidense 90 mensual). Firm USD 155/mo. Agency USD 250/mo. VPS entry renews at USD 54.99/mo. Cloud tier has no money-back window.
Mejor para: Managed WordPress and agency fleets that want a US-anchored cloud-CDN stack with a hard SLA.
Saltar si: You run anything but WordPress, or need real IaaS. DigitalOcean, Linode, or Kamatera all fit better.
Bluehost is on this list for completeness, and it's a strong managed-WordPress platform. But if you came for an AWS replacement, it isn't one; el otro 11 options solve AWS-shaped problems, and Cloudways covers managed WordPress at a fraction of the Boutique price.
12. Linode
242
3.0
Neutral
Neutral
Linode (Nube conectada de Akamai): Best Pure IaaS at Global Scale
Nanode from USD 5/mo | 41 core regions | 99.99% LECHUGA | Dólar estadounidense 100 crédito
41 regiones. That's the number that makes Linode the sharpest pure-IaaS swap here, and it's why the brand history matters: Akamai bought Linode in 2022 and folded it into Akamai Connected Cloud, extending compute into 41 core regions across 36 cities on the back of Akamai's edge network. The linode.com URLs still resolve, and the community kept saying "Linode" y "nanodo," so the vocabulary survived the acquisition even as the reach roughly doubled.
Pricing opens at 5 USD/mes for a Shared CPU Nanode (1 vCPU, 1 GB de RAM, 25 GB SSD, 1 Transferencia de TB), with Dedicated CPU from USD 36/mo and the newest 5th-gen AMD EPYC (zen 5) tiers from USD 50/mo. Hourly billing caps at the monthly rate, so a server run flat-out never bills above the listed price. That Nanode is USD 1 more than DigitalOcean's USD 4 Gotita, but you're buying 41 regions against DigitalOcean's 9. Las cuentas nuevas obtienen USD 100 in credit for 60 dias, half DigitalOcean's USD 200, so if the trial dollar figure is your tiebreaker, DigitalOcean wins that one.
Las debilidades honestas: the managed-services catalogue, while broader than DigitalOcean's, still trails AWS on depth (no full RDS/Lambda/analytics equivalent), and some of the most distributed compute metros need a sales conversation rather than a self-serve click. For anything that needs to land near users in Lagos, Bangkok, or Madrid without enterprise pricing, aunque, that region map is hard to beat.
Pros
- 41 core regions plus Akamai edge
- Hourly billing capped at monthly
- Dólar estadounidense 100 crédito por 60 dias
- 5th-gen AMD EPYC on newest tiers
Contras
- Deepest metros still gated by sales
- Managed catalogue trails AWS
- Brand transition fragments documentation
Precios: Shared Nanode USD 5/mo (1 GB, 1 vCPU, 25 GB). Dedicated from USD 36/mo. Newest EPYC tiers from USD 50/mo. Hourly capped at monthly. Dólar estadounidense 100 crédito, 60-validez del día.
Mejor para: Workloads that need genuine global reach with predictable flat pricing and light AWS-service dependency.
Saltar si: You need AWS Lambda parity or fully self-serve access to every metro. Cloudways-on-AWS or staying put covers that.
Linode is the strongest pure-IaaS pick here once you accept the rebrand awkwardness, and the Akamai edge integration is real added value. Choose it over Kamatera when region count is the deciding factor; choose Kamatera when per-second billing and custom shapes matter more.
Reseñas seleccionadas de Kamatera de HowToHosting.Guide
Usuario de Trustpilot de Alemania
Usuario de Trustpilot de Estados Unidos
Usuario de Trustpilot de Filipinas
How to Choose an AWS Alternative
Picking an AWS alternative isn't about crowning "the best cloud." It's about naming which AWS-shaped pain you're actually paying to kill. Haga coincidir su situación con una de estas:
Bill shock is the problem (un dólar 800 invoice you didn't see coming). audiencia estadounidense, want it to never happen again: InterServer, where the slice price locks for life and 32 slices deliver 64 TB of bundled transfer that would cost over USD 5,000 in AWS egress. Need international reach with the same predictability: Interesar, facturación por segundo, sin margen de renovación, 20+ regiones.
EC2-style workload, budget under USD 50/mo, and you just want a cleaner console. Go DigitalOcean. Droplets plus Managed Postgres plus Spaces cover most EC2 use cases at a tenth of the console overhead, and Spaces at USD 5/mo bundles a CDN. Skip Cloudways at this size if you have any DevOps skill, since the management premium (Dólar estadounidense 11 versus USD 4 directo) isn't worth it yet.
Same workload, but budget USD 50-200/mo and you need to be near users worldwide. Linode, Para el 41 regions and hourly-capped-at-monthly billing. DigitalOcean's 9 regions can't cover a worldwide audience, and this is the threshold where region count starts beating console polish.
EU-regulated data (GDPR, cuidado de la salud, fintech, public sector). IONOS is the only structural fit on this list. CLOUD Act exposure on AWS, even in EU regions, is a compliance dealbreaker, and IONOS answers it with BSI-C5 attestation and contractual EU residency. Verify your framework's specific uptime requirement with IONOS first, since the current SLA figure wasn't published at review time.
Agency or freelancer running 5 a 30 sitios de clientes. Cloudways is built for exactly this: one invoice, managed support across the fleet, and the option to put a scrappy client on DigitalOcean (Dólar estadounidense 11) and a demanding one on AWS (Dólar estadounidense 38.56). The 3-day trial is too short for real evaluation, so plan a first-month spend to test properly. For a comparison of where the management premium pays off, la guía de alojamiento en la nube administrado digs into the trade-off.
Production workload that lives or dies on uptime. Web líquida, Para el 100% network SLA with 10x downtime credit and human support. Real entry is USD 33/mo, no el dólar 3.50 titular. If you'd rather have broader geography at a lower price, AccuWebHosting gives you 16-plus locations at USD 4.99/mo with a 99.9% LECHUGA, trading the uptime guarantee for reach.
The most common mistake we see in buyer reviews: people compare entry prices and ignore the renewal. USD de Hostinger 7.99 se convierte en USD 25.99, Bluehost's VPS renews at USD 54.99, and Hosting.com doesn't publish its renewal at all. The providers that never bite you on year two are the usage-based and price-locked ones (DigitalOcean, Linode, Interesar, Hostwinds, Cloudways, InterServer). If entry price is your only filter, la cheap cloud hosting comparison ranks by real long-term cost rather than day-one promo rates.
Preguntas frecuentes
Is the AWS Free Tier still free in 2026?
Not the way it used to be. en julio 15, 2025, AWS replaced the old 12-month, 750-hours-of-t3.micro model with a credit-based system for new accounts. You now get up to USD 200 en créditos (Dólar estadounidense 100 al registrarse, Dólar estadounidense 100 more as you use services), and the Free Plan sandbox closes itself after six months or when the credits run out, lo que ocurra primero. Legacy accounts opened before that date keep the old terms. For anyone starting fresh, "AWS is free to begin with" is no longer accurate, which is exactly why providers like Kamatera (Dólar estadounidense 100 crédito de prueba) y DigitalOcean (Dólar estadounidense 200 para 60 dias) look more attractive now.
What are the hidden costs that make AWS bills spike?
Three line items catch people out. Egress: the first 100 GB a month is free, then it's USD 0.09/GB out of US regions, so a site pushing 1 TB pays around USD 80 in transfer alone. Public IPv4 addresses now cost USD 0.005/hour each, roughly USD 3.65/mo per address, even on running instances. And managed services (RDS, balanceadores de carga, NAT gateways) stack up fast. Most alternatives here bundle transfer instead: InterServer includes up to 64 tuberculosis, Hostwinds bundles 1 TB por servidor, and DigitalOcean gives 500 GB per Droplet.
Which AWS alternative is best for a small business on a tight budget?
For a small business that wants predictable spend, DigitalOcean and Kamatera both start at USD 4/mo with no renewal trap, and DigitalOcean's per-second billing plus S3-compatible Spaces make the migration painless. If you never needed real cloud and just run a website, Hostinger Cloud at USD 7.99/mo is simpler, but budget for the USD 25.99 renovación. If your bill anxiety is about surprises rather than the base rate, InterServer's price-lock removes the variable entirely at USD 3 a slice.
Do I have to rewrite my app to move off AWS?
Por lo general no, if your app uses standard building blocks. Calcular, attached storage, a SQL database, and an object store all port cleanly, and because DigitalOcean Spaces and IONOS object storage are S3-compatible, your existing S3 SDK calls keep working. The rewrite only shows up when you lean on AWS-specific services: lambda, DynamoDB, SQS, or SageMaker. Para aquellos, you either swap in an open-source equivalent or keep that one component on AWS while moving everything else, which is a common and perfectly sane hybrid.
Is Hetzner or Vultr cheaper than AWS EC2?
Both are, usually by a wide margin, though neither got a full section here since the list caps at 12. Vultr starts at USD 2.50/mo with per-second billing across 32 regiones, and Hetzner Cloud routinely posts some of the best price-to-performance ratios on the market for European workloads. Against a t3.micro at roughly USD 7.59/mo plus egress and IPv4 fees, both undercut AWS heavily. If raw price is your only metric, price them alongside Kamatera and InterServer before deciding.
Is DigitalOcean or Linode the better AWS replacement?
It comes down to region count versus trial credit and console feel. Linode (Akamai) te da 41 core regions to DigitalOcean's 9, so for a truly global audience Linode wins. DigitalOcean counters with a slicker developer experience, per-second billing capped at the monthly rate, and double the free credit (Dólar estadounidense 200 versus USD 100). For a US or single-region app, take DigitalOcean; for worldwide reach on flat pricing, take Linode.
Veredicto final
If you're leaving AWS because the bill is unpredictable, the fix depends on your geography. InterServer locks a US-only slice at USD 3 por vida, mientras Interesar y Linode give you the same per-usage honesty with global reach, Kamatera on per-second billing and custom shapes, Linode on 41 regiones.
If the pain is AWS's complexity rather than its price, DigitalOcean is the cleanest developer swap, y Cloudways lets an agency keep AWS underneath while trading the console for one flat invoice. If you're EU-regulated, IÓNICO is the only option here that survives a CLOUD Act review. And if uptime is the whole point, Web líquida's 100% SLA earns its USD 33 entrada.
The rest fit narrower slots. Hostwinds is the cheap hourly box for burst jobs, AccuWebHosting buys the widest region map per dollar, Alojamiento.com bundles a security stack onto a managed VPS, Hostinger is the soft landing for anyone who never needed AWS, y Bluehost is really a managed-WordPress platform wearing a cloud label. Lo que sea que elijas, check the renewal before the entry price, since that's where most AWS refugees get burned a second time.
Still mapping the options? Nuestro Resumen de alojamiento VPS covers the providers here that technically live in the VPS tier, and if your workload is EU-bound, la best cloud hosting in Europe guide goes deeper on regional and sovereignty picks beyond IONOS.